[gmx-users] a question on the -sed, trjconv output & g_order
priyanka srivastava
priyankaps4 at yahoo.com
Sat Aug 19 11:15:38 CEST 2006
Dear Gromacs Users,
I have a doubt related to the .gro file that I am
extracting using:
trjconv -f test.trr -o test.gro -b 0 -e 1000 -sep -s
test.tpr
I get the time pattern, a portion of which is like
this in the files say from 0 to 1000ps:
h 48 lipids and 1437 waters t= 85.00001
h 48 lipids and 1437 waters t= 90.00001
h 48 lipids and 1437 waters t= 95.00001
h 48 lipids and 1437 waters t= 100.00001
h 48 lipids and 1437 waters t= 105.00001
h 48 lipids and 1437 waters t= 110.00001
h 48 lipids and 1437 waters t= 115.00001
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
h 48 lipids and 1437 waters t= 920.00006
h 48 lipids and 1437 waters t= 925.00006
h 48 lipids and 1437 waters t= 930.00006
h 48 lipids and 1437 waters t= 935.00006
h 48 lipids and 1437 waters t= 940.00006
h 48 lipids and 1437 waters t= 945.00006
My doubt is: what are these 1 and 6 in some of the
time values. I am saving the coordinates after every
5ps, why is this not exact, e.g. t= 945.00000 ?
I am facing some problem in the g_order analysis tool
of gromacs version 3.3 which might be because of the
above-mentioned problem.
When I use -b 0 -e 1000 in the g_order then it gives
me 10 frames less each time, or in other words 50ps
missing each time.
When I run g_order for the same file in gromacs
version3.2 then it reports exactly 200 frames and
1000ps time.
I do not think that mixing the two versions would be a
good idea, i.e. generating the trr on v3.3 and
analysing them on v3.2.
Any help would be really useful as I have trr files
but I am unable to do the analysis.
Can this be due to some problem in the mdp file or
submitting of the run too?
kindly help,
Pri...
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list