[gmx-users] spurious dihedral warnings

Berk Hess gmx3 at hotmail.com
Fri Feb 3 14:44:14 CET 2006

>From: "Moore, Jonathan (J)" <JMoore2 at dow.com>
>Reply-To: Discussion list for GROMACS users <gmx-users at gromacs.org>
>To: 'Discussion list for GROMACS users' <gmx-users at gromacs.org>
>Subject: RE: [gmx-users] spurious dihedral warnings
>Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 07:36:13 -0600
>What I meant to say is that I've used the format to define the A- and
>B-state bonded interactions for all atoms that are perturbed in any way, 
>not "all" as I wrote below. I didn't specify B-state bonded parameters for
>atoms that were unperturbed.

I didn't say anything about that.
Doing that is fine.
I you specify both the A and the B-state paramaters grompp will use them 


More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users mailing list