[gmx-users] simulation crash
Anton Feenstra
feenstra at few.vu.nl
Tue Feb 28 10:13:19 CET 2006
herbst at fhi-berlin.mpg.de wrote:
> I use constraints on the c-alpha atoms, so the helix should be stable.
> I of course optimized the starting geometry, I tried to use the output
> geometry of a 600 K run as input file, and I tried the simulation with a
> larger box, but none of this worked. What else can I try ? What could be
> going wrong ?
Constraints can make your simulation unstable, especially if there are
many and/or they are very tight. The problem is that tight (or many)
constraints are prone to high-frequency oscillations, which may be too
fast for the integration timestep that you are using. (But, that does
not explain why your 600K simulations do not crash...)
Have you tried slowly (e.g. over several 100 ps) decreasing the
temperature, e.g. using the simulated annealing option?
--
Groetjes,
Anton
* NOTE: New Affiliation, Phone & Fax numbers (below) *
_____________ _______________________________________________________
| | |
| _ _ ___,| K. Anton Feenstra |
| / \ / \'| | | IBIVU/Bioinformatics - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam |
|( | )| | | De Boelelaan 1083 - 1081A HV Amsterdam - Netherlands |
| \_/ \_/ | | | Tel +31 20 59 87783 - Fax +31 20 59 87653 - Room P440 |
| | Feenstra at few.vu.nl - www.few.vu.nl/~feenstra/ |
| | "If You See Me Getting High, Knock Me Down" (RHCP) |
|_____________|_______________________________________________________|
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list