[gmx-users] Size of perturbed groups in FEP
Maik Goette
mgoette at mpi-bpc.mpg.de
Wed Jan 11 16:33:39 CET 2006
Hi
I think its practicable. You should use softcore potential in that case.
I don't think, that you have to include the BB-atoms, too.
You can do that, but I can't see the need for that.
Regards
Maik Goette, Dipl. Biol.
Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry
Theoretical & computational biophysics department
Am Fassberg 11
37077 Goettingen
Germany
Tel. : ++49 551 201 2310
Fax : ++49 551 201 2302
Email : mgoette[at]mpi-bpc.mpg.de
mgoette2[at]gwdg.de
WWW : http://www.mpibpc.gwdg.de/groups/grubmueller/
Bruce Milne wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have been wondering about the possibility of doing free energy
> calculations on D- and L- forms of amino acids incorporated into small
> peptides but I have no experience in this area and I was just wondering
> if it is possible to do free energy perturbations on groups as large as
> the side chains in e.g. isoleucine. It seems to me that changing a
> hydrogen atom for, say, a methyl group might be OK but what about
> something as large as -CH(CH3)CH2CH3 ?
>
> I guess in practice the unit to be perturbed would have to include the
> backbone carbon plus the hydrogen and side chain in order to go from the
> D- to the L-form of an amino acid.
>
> Sorry if this is really basic and obvious but any advice would be
> greatly appreciated.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bruce
>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list