[gmx-users] Electrostatics and VDW
dmobley at gmail.com
Tue Jan 24 18:34:19 CET 2006
With PME, you don't have to have rlist<rvdw. You might, however, want to
have rlist slightly larger than rvdw. You don't have to, but since the
neighbor list is only updated every nstlist steps, if rlist is the same as
rvdw, you can run into the situation where an atom has moved inside the vdw
cutoff in a couple of steps, but your calculation doesn't realize it has
moved inside the cutoff until after nstlist steps. You can solve the
problem, of course, by using nstlist=1, but that could slow things down a
lot, so it may be better to simply use, say, rlist=1.1 and rvdw=1.0 so atoms
appear in the neighbor list before getting counted for vdw interactions.
On 1/24/06, Una Bjarnadottir <una.bjarnadottir at ucd.ie> wrote:
> Dear all,
> Just to have the content of this discussion clear
> and all other discussion on this matter.
> When using coulombtype = PME and vdw-type = Cut-off is it alright to
> have the;
> rlist=rvdw=rcoulomb = 1
> rvdw-switch=rcoulomb-swithc = 0
> Or does it have to be;
> rlist=rcoulmb = 0.9 and rvdw = 1.4
> Is the 2nd thing only for cut-off but not for PME?
> Thanks in advance for any replies, this is confusing me a lot.
> gmx-users mailing list
> gmx-users at gromacs.org
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users