[gmx-users] Re: Re: Re: temperature and pressure values
Yang Ye
leafyoung81-group at yahoo.com
Thu Jan 26 19:11:19 CET 2006
5 days for 45ns. how big is your system? and what parameters you have
set for electrostatic/vdw calculation?
Yang Ye
Marino Convertino wrote:
> Dear Mark and all,
> Sorry for boring you again.
> I have performed a g_energy check.
> Firstly I use a 45ps NPT equilibration with costrained protein then
> another 45ps NPT equilibration with free protein.
> Now I am studying a 350k full dynamics of the same system.
> These are the g_energy results:
>
> For the first equilibration:
> Statistics over 30001 steps [ 0.0000 thru 45.0000 ps ], 3 data sets
>
> Energy Average RMSD Fluct. Drift
> Tot-Drift
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Total Energy -332261 2534.56 1997.14 -120.13
> -5406.05
> Temperature 353.591 1.91115 1.89532 0.0188968
> 0.850383
> Pressure (bar) -26.2488 132.2 124.656
> 3.38837 152.482
> Heat Capacity Cv: 12.4723 J/mol K (factor = 2.92137e-05)
>
> For the second equilibration:
> Statistics over 30001 steps [ 0.0000 thru 45.0000 ps ], 3 data sets
>
> Energy Average RMSD Fluct. Drift
> Tot-Drift
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Total Energy -333296 405.704 402.837
> 3.70631 166.789
> Temperature 353.436 1.3876 1.38391 0.00778066
> 0.350141
> Pressure (bar) 1.51139 98.9854 98.9833
> -0.0503028 -2.2637
> Heat Capacity Cv: 12.4721 J/mol K (factor = 1.54138e-05)
>
> For full dynamics (45ns) after 5-days-computing time:
> Statistics over 5617501 steps [ 0.0000 thru 8426.2500 ps ], 3 data sets
>
> Energy Average RMSD Fluct. Drift
> Tot-Drift
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Total Energy -333496 458.834 457.266
> 0.0155822 131.299
> Temperature 353.429 1.39732 1.39731 2.05578e-06
> 0.0173225
> Pressure (bar) 1.02358 99.7865 99.7842
> -0.000278171 -2.34394
> Heat Capacity Cv: 12.4721 J/mol K (factor = 1.56309e-05)
>
> Would you think they are ok?
> Can I consider satisfactory the average values of temperature and
> pressure?
> If not, I will try to follow your previous suggestions adding two NVT
> equilibration steps (before the NPT ones, because the EM steps worked
> fine).
>
> Thanks a lot
> Marino
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> gmx-users mailing list
> gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
--
/Regards,/
Yang Ye
/Computational Biology Lab
School of Biological Sciences
Nanyang Technological University
Singapore
Tel: 6316-2884
/
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list