[gmx-users] MPICH or LAM/MPI
ckutzne at gwdg.de
Mon Jun 19 10:28:51 CEST 2006
since it does not take long to install lam and mpich, I would install
both MPI implementations and then benchmark with a typical MD system
which one performs better.
I would suggest LAM 7.1.2 which is the newest version, and MPICH-2
1.0.3, which works well, at least on our cluster. Many users (including
myself) found that GROMACS on top of MPICH-1.2.x hangs when executed on
more than 4 CPUs.
My guess is that LAM-GROMACS outperforms MPICH-GROMACS on a smaller
number of CPUs, but on 6 or more CPUs MPICH-GROMACS might be faster,
since it provides optimized collective communication routines.
If you only want to install a single MPI implementation, I would choose
LAM for a start.
Hope that helps,
hseara at netscape.net wrote:
> Dear Gmx-Users,
> I'm configuring a small cluster of 5 Dell Power Edge 1800 with dual xeon
> conected by a gigabit dell switch. I was wondering which MPI
> distribution, LAM/MPI or MPICH(which version), on this platform has
> better performance for gromacs 3.3.1 on a fedora 5 linux distribution.
> I will try to combine that with SGEgrid as a queue manager. Also I will
> like to know if I can expect for big systems, 200.000 atoms, good
> parallelitzarion in the 5 nodes ( 10 processors).
> Thank you
> Hector Martínez-Seara Monné
> University of Barcelona
> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
> interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
Dr. Carsten Kutzner
Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry
Theoretical and Computational Biophysics Department
Am Fassberg 11
37077 Goettingen, Germany
Tel. +49-551-2012313, Fax: +49-551-2012302
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users