[gmx-users] grompp single vs double precisions
leafyoung81-group at yahoo.com
Sat Mar 4 06:13:22 CET 2006
Mark Abraham wrote:
>> i have compiled the double version of mdrun. but i didn't for grompp
>> since i didn't think it was necessary. the question i have for you
>> guys is then: is the double version of grompp also necessary?
> I doubt single/double mdrun will matter to you for geometry
> optimization. I don't know if double grompp is necessary to make
> double mdrun effective - my guess would be not necessary.
There something to be disputable over whether necessary or not: in some
cases, necessary (if need to extend your simulation); in other cases,
not necessary (simply just run once). Compiling it is so easy, why not
save the risk to build it.
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users