[gmx-users] grompp single vs double precisions
Yang Ye
leafyoung81-group at yahoo.com
Sat Mar 4 06:16:28 CET 2006
rob yang wrote:
> hi list,
> i am comparing the relative energy differences between different
> conformations of a same molecule in vaccuum. i am using both gromacs
> and another software to compare the results. the forcefield for both
> softwares is oplsaa (2001), and i've manually verified that they are
> indeed the same for my molecule as well as the partial charges.
> the relative energy results obtained from these 2 softwares are
> different. i understand that different softwares have different
> implementations but i think i should be able to get a similiar
> relative energies for these conformations.
> so i am thinking maybe the minimizations is where things went wrong. i
> have compiled the double version of mdrun. but i didn't for grompp
> since i didn't think it was necessary. the question i have for you
> guys is then: is the double version of grompp also necessary?
>
> what other insights do you guys have to the differences? thank you
> very much. i'll also present the em.mdp i used below:
> title = em
> cpp = /lib/cpp
> define = -DFLEXIBLE
> constraints = none
> integrator = cg
> dt = 0.002
> nsteps = 100000
> nstlist = 10
> ns_type = grid
> rlist = 0.8 ;short range
> rcoulomb = 1.4 ;long range
When you refer this rcoulomb as long range, do you mean to use PME. You
did not have this option in the mdp.
> rvdw = 1.4 ;long range
> ;
> ; Energy minimizing stuff
> ;
> emtol = 1
> emstep = 0.001
> nstcgsteep = 10
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
> interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list