[gmx-users] problem going from cut-off to pme
Yiannis
ioannis.nicolis at free.fr
Wed Mar 8 02:33:35 CET 2006
Hello,
I have a strange problem with a 100 molecule system where I used cut-
off electrostatics and I want to use pme from now.
After md with Coulomb cut-off, I minimised with steep (and the same
Coulomb cut-off) and it ends OK:
> Step= 395, Dmax= 1.7e-06 nm, Epot= -5.04260e+04 Fmax= 1.15989e+02,
> atom= 4130
> Step= 396, Dmax= 2.0e-06 nm, Epot= -5.04045e+04 Fmax= 1.15977e+02,
> atom= 4130
> Stepsize too small, or no change in energy.
> Converged to machine precision,
> but not to the requested precision Fmax < 1
>
> Double precision normally gives you higher accuracy.
>
> writing lowest energy coordinates.
>
> Steepest Descents converged to machine precision in 397 steps,
> but did not reach the requested Fmax < 1.
> Potential Energy = -5.0425977e+04
> Maximum force = 1.1598901e+02 on atom 4130
> Norm of force = 1.6355400e+03
I take this minimised .gro and I minimise it again but now I change
to PME electrostatics. It crashes from the beginning with an infinite
force (not on the atom with the previous maximum force) and the
energy is huge: 6.56504e+19 instead of -5.0425977e+04 which was the
end of the previous minimisation. Do you have any explanation? Should
I change some PME parameters?
> Step= 0, Dmax= 1.0e-02 nm, Epot= 6.56504e+19 Fmax= inf,
> atom= 164
> Step= 14, Dmax= 1.2e-06 nm, Epot= 6.56504e+19 Fmax= inf,
> atom= 164
> Stepsize too small, or no change in energy.
> Converged to machine precision,
> but not to the requested precision Fmax < 1
>
> Double precision normally gives you higher accuracy.
>
> writing lowest energy coordinates.
>
> Steepest Descents converged to machine precision in 15 steps,
> but did not reach the requested Fmax < 1.
> Potential Energy = 6.5650353e+19
> Maximum force = inf on atom 164
> Norm of force = inf
Thanks for any advice,
Ioannis
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list