[gmx-users] Re: LINCS Warning using mdrun
Grazia Daminelli
Grazia.Daminelli-Widany at TU-Berlin.DE
Wed Mar 15 12:05:45 CET 2006
Dear Jochen
what do you mean with:
>Better show us the output of your energy minimization. The ouput of your
>md only shows that your sctructure has some serious problem...like your
>box is too small or whatever...
>
>Jochen
>
which term is telling you that there are problems?
The bonded terms, which are all positive?
The LJ (SR) which is positive and big?
and what about the LJ-14 and Coulomb-14?
I am asking because the energies given by Guarav are not that different
from the results I get - and somewhere I have a problem, I know, because
my md simulations are not stable (but I can't find out the reason)
a comment would be highly appreciated
Grazia
>For the initial mdrun, (i.e. energy min before the actual md) the log
>file output (last part is). After this em step I use grompp with my
>final mdp file and then mdrun where I get the LINCS error.
>
>Thanks
>gaurav
>
>Energies (kJ/mol)
> Bond Angle Proper Dih. Ryckaert-Bell. LJ-14
> 3.35740e+03 1.35497e+03 4.60212e+01 8.38627e+02 1.33998e+03
> Coulomb-14 LJ (SR) Coulomb (SR) Coul. recip. Potential
> 4.11813e+03 5.16092e+04 -3.42126e+05 -3.63260e+04 -3.15787e+05
> Kinetic En. Total Energy Temperature Pressure (bar)
> 0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00
>
> Step Time Lambda
> 165 165.00000 0.00000
>
> Step Time Lambda
> 166 166.00000 0.00000
>
> Step Time Lambda
> 167 167.00000 0.00000
>
> Energies (kJ/mol)
> Bond Angle Proper Dih. Ryckaert-Bell. LJ-14
> 3.35747e+03 1.35504e+03 4.60229e+01 8.38637e+02 1.33998e+03
> Coulomb-14 LJ (SR) Coulomb (SR) Coul. recip. Potential
> 4.11748e+03 5.16092e+04 -3.42126e+05 -3.63260e+04 -3.15788e+05
> Kinetic En. Total Energy Temperature Pressure (bar)
> 0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00
>
> Step Time Lambda
> 168 168.00000 0.00000
>
> Step Time Lambda
> 169 169.00000 0.00000
>
> Step Time Lambda
> 170 170.00000 0.00000
>
>
>Stepsize too small, or no change in energy.
>Converged to machine precision,
>but not to the requested precision Fmax < 10
>
>Double precision normally gives you higher accuracy.
>You might need to increase your constraint accuracy, or turn
>off constraints alltogether (set constraints = none in mdp file)
>
>Steepest Descents converged to machine precision in 171 steps,
>but did not reach the requested Fmax < 10.
>Potential Energy = -3.1578772e+05
>Maximum force = 5.0164816e+04 on atom 897
>Norm of force = 1.1000233e+05
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list