[gmx-users] negative delta-lambda values?

[Lars Schaefer]

hi Mauricio,
this is definately not the problem. for a reverse run, you of course can 
apply, e.g., delta-lamda = -2e-06.
you should check your topology and stuff.
BTW: discrete lamda sampling is superior to slow growth.
lars

Mauricio Sica wrote:

>Dear all
>
>does anybody knows if there is some problem using NEGATIVE delta-lambda in
>a FEP mutation? I´ve used POSITIVE values many times in my system and
>never had problems. But now, for the reverse pathway, when I tried with a
>NEGATIVE delta-lambda for a mutations from lambda=1 to Lambda=0.9, after
>few ps, some problems with LINCS arose and the run crashed. Maybe I´m
>wrong in attributing this failure to the use of NEGATIVE delta-lambda
>values.
>Thanks for your response
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
>http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
>Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
>www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
>  
>