[gmx-users] Dihedral angle in OPLS-AA force field
alokjain at iitk.ac.in
alokjain at iitk.ac.in
Mon Sep 11 11:04:36 CEST 2006
Dear All,
I have a basic question on Dihedral angle in OPLS-AA force field.
I read some of the papers related to development of OPLS force field where
they have different formula for calculating the torsion angle
I think that is Ryckaert-Bellemans function, but there is no separate term
for Improper dihedral term.
when I tried to run a simulation using OPLS-AA force field gromacs 3.2.1
version (pdb2gmx option 3) I got following energy terms in my log file.
Energies (kJ/mol)
Bond Angle Proper Dih. Ryckaert-Bell. LJ-14
1.15231e+03 2.92374e+03 1.73760e+02 1.32334e+03 1.86599e+03
Coulomb-14 LJ (SR) LJ (LR) Coulomb (SR) Coulomb (LR)
5.03326e+03 1.39004e+05 -1.66722e+03 -9.54632e+05 -5.37046e+04
Potential Kinetic En. Total Energy Temperature Pressure (bar)
-8.58528e+05 1.57277e+05 -7.01250e+05 3.04174e+02 -4.80269e+01
so I am getting two proper dihedral term in output(Proper Dih. and
Ryckaert-Bell.).But when I checked the ffoplsaabon.itp file I got
following comments
Improper OPLS dihedrals to keep groups planar.
; (OPLS doesnt use improper for chiral atoms).
; Since these functions are periodic of the form 1-cos(2*x), the are
; actually implemented as proper dihedrals [1+cos(2*x+180)] for the moment,
; to keep things compatible.
So its mean Proper Dih. which I am getting, In reality it is Improper
Dihedral? and Ryckaert-Bell for proper dihedral, (please correct me if
I am wrong).But in original OPLS force field Improper Dihedral was not
defined so how we can justify uses of Improper Dihedral.
Best regards,
Alok
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list