[gmx-users] Diagnosing an explosion
David van der Spoel
spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se
Sun Dec 9 14:51:56 CET 2007
Steven Kirk wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am having a problem with my BD simulation either crashing with a Range
> error or locking up the mdrun process completely.
>
> I am running Gromacs 3.3.1 (must use this version ATM because HPC
> provider has not upgraded yet) on a quad core Intel machine, w/ Fedora
> Core 7.
>
> I have 1000 'particles' in a cubic box (configuration here:
>
> http://datavet.hv.se/personal/SK/publicfiles/colloid.pdb
>
> where the particles are placed randomly with no two particle centres
> closer than 4 nm.
>
> The particles are defined in the topology here:
>
> ; Complete topology file
> ;
> ; particles.itp
>
> [ defaults ]
> 1 1 no 1.0 1.0
>
> [ atomtypes ]
> AR 28699.81134 0.00 A 1.0 1.0
Looks like you are using dimensionless eps and sigma while using
otherwise MD units (e.g. T). Check chapter 2 of the manual. You want to
multiply your T by boltz (0.008314 or something like that) probably.
>
> [ bondtypes ]
>
> ; molecule.itp
>
> [ nonbond_params ]
> AR AR 1 1.0 1.0
>
> [ moleculetype ]
> AR 0
>
> [ atoms ]
> 1 AR 1 AR AR 1 0 28699.81134
>
> ; colloid.top
> ; #include "particles.itp"
> ; #include "molecule.itp"
>
> [ system ]
> Aggregation simulation
>
> [ molecules ]
> AR 1000
>
> The particles interact via the tabulated non-bonded potential held here:
>
> http://datavet.hv.se/personal/SK/publicfiles/table.xvg
>
> and the mdrun is controlled by the mdp file settings:
>
> ; Input file
> ;
> title = Aggregation
> cpp = /lib/cpp
> constraints = none
> integrator = bd
> dt = 0.002 ; ps !
> nsteps = 1000000 ;
> nstcomm = 1
> nstxout = 10
> nstvout = 10
> nstfout = 0
> nstlog = 1
> nstenergy = 1
> nstlist = 5
> ns_type = grid
> coulombtype = User
> vdwtype = User
> rlist = 5.036
> rcoulomb = 5.036
> rvdw = 5.036
> table-extension = 0.3
> comm-mode = None
> bd_fric = 5000
> ; Berendsen temperature coupling is on in two groups
> Tcoupl = berendsen
> tc-grps = System
> tau_t = 0.1
> ref_t = 300
> ; Energy monitoring
> energygrps = AR
> ; Isotropic pressure coupling is now off
> Pcoupl = no
> Pcoupltype = isotropic
> tau_p = 0.5
> compressibility = 4.5e-5
> ref_p = 1.0
> ; Generate velocites is on at 300 K.
> gen_vel = yes
> gen_temp = 300.0
> gen_seed = -1
>
> Two strange things happen in this simulation - between the first and
> second step, the temperature approximately doubles to 600K, and remains
> approximately at this value for almost as long as the simulation runs.
> Why does the thermostat stabilize at almost exactly 2x the requested
> temperature?
>
> The second strange event is the explosion (I have looked at the output
> from g_energy up to this point, and the total and potential energies
> drop nicely up to the point where the simulation crashes, either with a
> range error or a frozen process.
>
> From md.log:
>
> Step Time Lambda
> 59840 119.68001 0.00000
>
> Energies (kJ/mol)
> LJ (SR) Coulomb (SR) Potential Kinetic En. Total Energy
> -2.18045e+04 0.00000e+00 -2.18045e+04 7.47528e+03 -1.43292e+04
> Temperature Pressure (bar)
> 5.99376e+02 1.67395e-01
>
> Step Time Lambda
> 59841 119.68201 0.00000
>
> Energies (kJ/mol)
> LJ (SR) Coulomb (SR) Potential Kinetic En. Total Energy
> -2.85992e+29 0.00000e+00 -2.85992e+29 9.18128e+25 -2.85900e+29
> Temperature Pressure (bar)
> 7.36165e+24 1.50577e+21
>
> Step Time Lambda
> 59842 119.68401 0.00000
>
> Energies (kJ/mol)
> LJ (SR) Coulomb (SR) Potential Kinetic En. Total Energy
> -inf 0.00000e+00 -inf inf nan
> Temperature Pressure (bar)
> inf inf
>
> Step Time Lambda
> 59843 119.68600 0.00000
>
> Energies (kJ/mol)
> LJ (SR) Coulomb (SR) Potential Kinetic En. Total Energy
> nan 0.00000e+00 nan nan nan
> Temperature Pressure (bar)
> nan nan
>
> and then comes the range error.
>
> Clearly something very nasty happens between step 59840 and 59841.
>
> Both reducing the timestep and increasing bd_fric delay the crash, but
> do not prevent it. I have inspected the trajectory visually using VMD
> and it does not look unusual. Doing an EM minimization step on the
> original coordinates before running the full BD run does not cure the
> problem either.
>
> I would be very grateful for suggestions as to what is causing this (my
> main suspect at the moment is the tabulated potential) and what I can do
> to either fix it or diagnose the true cause.
>
> Many thanks in advance,
> Steve Kirk
>
--
David van der Spoel, Ph.D.
Molec. Biophys. group, Dept. of Cell & Molec. Biol., Uppsala University.
Box 596, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden. Phone: +46184714205. Fax: +4618511755.
spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se spoel at gromacs.org http://folding.bmc.uu.se
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list