[gmx-users] Brownian dynamics
smayinj at nus.edu.sg
Mon Dec 24 11:51:41 CET 2007
Thanks for the message.
But the friction is just I want to add in. The dipole of the water
I may use the dielectric constant to mimic its screening. So I donot
Think the information on this page helpful. What is its vacuum? The
model of water is just three LJ balls and a dipole, right?
Anyway what I am concerning is the so called Brownian dynamics
In gromacs is a valid version or not yet?
From: gmx-users-bounces at gromacs.org
[mailto:gmx-users-bounces at gromacs.org] On Behalf Of Mark Abraham
Sent: Monday, December 24, 2007 6:21 PM
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Brownian dynamics
Yin Jian wrote:
> Hi Berk,
> I am looking for a way to be able to run MD faster without
> Explicit solvent component. Brownian dynamics (I mean langevin
> Dynamics) is way out I think. But I am not sure the package
> Implemented in Gromacs is a good one or not yet. Since I have
> Seen no one using it in the literature yet, right?
gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users