[gmx-users] Why so many energy minimization and position restrained simulation steps?
tsjerkw at gmail.com
Tue Nov 20 09:18:41 CET 2007
To understand the differencxes between the runs, you'll have to read and
compare the .mdp files well. I'd suggest to start with the Gromacs manual,
chapter 7. For one, position restraint MD depends on the presence of [
position_restraints ] in the topology and has nothing to do with the length
of the run. Please do some more background reading on MD. Often, inclusion
of the [ position_restraints ] is controlled in the .mdp file by adding a
define statement (-DPOSRES).
Why Bonvin uses so many steps of energy minimization and position restraint
MD is unclear to me. For a normal MD simulation it's not necessary. A fairly
common scheme used is:
1. EM in vacuum
2. EM in solvent
3. PR MD
4. NVT MD equilibration
5. NPT MD equilibration
6. Production run
You could have a look at the following tutorial rather than Bonvins:
Hope it helps,
On Nov 20, 2007 6:29 AM, Peggy Yao <peggy.yao at gmail.com> wrote:
> I am new to Gromacs. I am following this tutorial:
> question is: why it has multiple steps of energy minimization and
> position restrained simulation? Is that a common practice? What's the
> key difference among these steps?
> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Ph.D.
Junior UD (post-doc)
Biomolecular NMR, Bijvoet Center
3584 CH Utrecht
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users