[gmx-users] Dummies usage doubts

[Jones de Andrade]

Hi Prof. David.

Yes, it a self created topology. This one is based on another self created
topology that runs perfectly for cyclohexane. It was adapted to include the
dummy atoms.

I guess there is something wrong in the definition of the dummies in the
topology. But I have no clue where it is. Can you provide me some clue on
this?

I'll run a single molecule now.

Thanks a lot in advance,

Sincerally yours,

Jones

On 10/11/07, David van der Spoel <spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se> wrote:
>
> Jones de Andrade wrote:
> > Hi Prof. David.
> >
> > What details do you mean? Actual topology files are attached. Anything
> else?
> >
> > Thanks a lot in advance!
> >
> > Sincerally yours,
> >
> > Jones
> >
> There is something wrong in the topology, youäll have to debug it
> yourself...
>
> --
> David van der Spoel, Ph.D.
> Molec. Biophys. group, Dept. of Cell & Molec. Biol., Uppsala University.
> Box 596, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden. Phone:  +46184714205. Fax: +4618511755.
> spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se    spoel at gromacs.org   http://folding.bmc.uu.se
> _______________________________________________
> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://maillist.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-users/attachments/20071011/45208f4c/attachment.html>