[gmx-users] Why Total Energy is positive??
Robert Johnson
bobjohnson1981 at gmail.com
Wed Sep 5 17:41:34 CEST 2007
Think about what a carbon nanotube is....you can think about it as a
rolled up graphene sheet. Graphene is made up entirely of sp2 carbons
- which means that the carbons want to reside in a planar arrangement.
Rolling the sheet up into a tube requires energy. Your positive energy
reflects this.
Bob
On 9/5/07, uki zhu <ukizhu at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, gmx-users,
> These days I am trying to do some systems about carbon tubes. And I found
> Total Energy of the system is positive whether Energy Minimization or MD.
> The amount of Total Energy is about E03.
>
> For example,
> ""
> Step Time Lambda
> 5000 5.00000 0.00000
>
> Energies (kJ/mol)
> Morse G96Angle Proper Dih. LJ (SR) Coulomb (SR)
> 5.92521e+02 9.76865e+02 6.24199e+03 -1.72019e+03 0.00000e+00
> Potential Kinetic En. Total Energy Temperature Pressure (bar)
> 6.09119e+03 3.32193e+03 9.41312e+03 3.02677e+02 8.29506e-02
> ""
> in a log file.
>
> Is anyone who can help me to solve this problem?
>
> Thanks very much.
>
> uki
>
> _______________________________________________
> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> Can't post? Read
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list