[gmx-users] Warning message with 3.3.3 but not with 3.3.1
tuyusong
tuyusong at gmail.com
Wed Apr 16 22:10:36 CEST 2008
David wrote:
> you can not only remove the com motion of one group. it is all (in one
> or more groups) or nothing.
Thank you for replying.
Do you mean, that it must be nothing when system has any freeze groups?
Yusong.
-----Original Message-----
From: gmx-users-bounces at gromacs.org [mailto:gmx-users-bounces at gromacs.org]
On Behalf Of David van der Spoel
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 4:01 AM
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Warning message with 3.3.3 but not with 3.3.1
tuyusong wrote:
> Even in the system with position-restrain, when only removing com of SOL
> group, gmx 3.3.3 also give the same error information as Bo:
you can not only remove the com motion of one group. it is all (in one
or more groups) or nothing.
>
> Large VCM(group rest): 0.00001, -0.00002, -0.00000, T-cm:
> Inf
>
> Yusong
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gmx-users-bounces at gromacs.org [mailto:gmx-users-bounces at gromacs.org]
> On Behalf Of David van der Spoel
> Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 3:21 AM
> To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
> Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Warning message with 3.3.3 but not with 3.3.1
>
> Bo Zhou wrote:
>> Hi gmx-users,
>>
>> I want to simulate a solid/water interface. I just freeze the solid
> surface,
>> and let the water molecules free to move. Here is a part of my mdp as
>> follows:
>>
>> comm-mode = linear
>> nstcomm = 10
>> comm-grps = SOL
>>
>> tcoupl = Berendsen
>> tc-grps = SOL Solid
>> tau-t = 0.1 0.1
>> ref-t = 298 0
>>
>> Same system and same sets were tested both in gmx 3.3.1 and gmx 3.3.3.
>> Following message in the log file was printed in the log file with gmx
>> 3.3.3, but not with gmx 3.3.1.
>>
>> Large VCM(group rest): 0.00001, -0.00002, -0.00000, T-cm:
>> inf
>>
>> Large VCM(group rest): 0.00001, -0.00003, -0.00000, T-cm:
>> inf
>>
>> Large VCM(group rest): -0.00000, -0.00003, -0.00000, T-cm:
>> inf
>>
>> I wonder whether it is reasonable to stopcm or not. Would it cause any
>> non-physical artifacts? Thanks for suggestions.
>
> stopcm tries to change the velocity of the rest group (solid) as well.
> Unfortunately you can not turn this off for one group. I'm not sure
> while this is different from 3.3.1, but since you have a solid reference
> you probably don't need to stopcm.
>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
>> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
>> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before
posting!
>> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
>> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
>
>
--
David.
________________________________________________________________________
David van der Spoel, PhD, Assoc. Prof., Molecular Biophysics group,
Dept. of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University.
Husargatan 3, Box 596, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden
phone: 46 18 471 4205 fax: 46 18 511 755
spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se spoel at gromacs.org http://folding.bmc.uu.se
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list