[gmx-users] Some Issues on Substrates/PBC

Michael Hirtz hirtz at uni-muenster.de
Thu Aug 7 14:42:42 CEST 2008


Hi Justin,

> In addition to that, you may consider using pbc = full to get an
> infinite system and potentially avoid some of those edge effects it
> looks like you are seeing. I know others have used that kind of
> setup with carbon nanotubes (not my area of expertise, but I've read
> the discussions).

Thanks a lot! That was a great tip! :) With the pbc = full setting I can use
my topologies with bonds defined over the periodic boundaries without messing
up the structure. I'll use the freezegrps additionally nevertheless because it
speeds up the simulation and my substrate isn't supposed to move anyway, but
with the 'full' option it would even work out without.

I only wonder what's the difference between 'full' and 'xyz'? In the manual
'full' is not even mentioned and on the list archives I found several posts
that tell that 'xyz' is a kind of optimization that does not work for infinite
systems (hence my problems), and it could not be used with constraints in
earlier versions, but now it's fine. Is there anything more I should know
about the 'full' option, or why is it not listed in the run parameters section
of the manual?

Best regards,
   Michael
-- 
http://www.defux.de



More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users mailing list