[gmx-users] single-precision *.tpr data after a double-precision run

[Inon Sharony]

I checked the *.trr, it does in fact show the coordinates in  
double-precision (as opposed to the output *.tpr file). I don't know  
why this is, but as long as I get a decent enough max. fore (i.e.  
~1E-05) I'll just leave it at that. I didn't see anything relevant in  
the *.edr file, so I'll just include the *.trr every time I run NMA.  
The em step is not specified in the nm.mdp file, so I guess I could  
add it (and specify 1E-05) and I hope that will help.

Thanks again.

Inon.

Quoting "Ran Friedman" <r.friedman at bioc.uzh.ch>:

> Inon Sharony wrote:
>> so it's an improvement of more than 6 orders of magnitude! Could
it be
>> that the *.trr file have the coordinates in double-precision?
> Right.
>> Not to be petty, but still, I had a max. force of
5.38105464411935e-05
>> using the minimization procedure, and the Hessian calculation only
got
>> 4.32762e-04. That's still an order of magnitude that does not
transfer
>> from the energy minimization step to the Hessian calculation step.
Why?
> Sounds strange. You can try to save the forces in the trr and see
if it
> gets more accurate. Also, do you use the same emstep as in the em
file?
> I guess this determines the displacement in NMA as well.
>
> Ran.
> _______________________________________________
> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before
posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
>

-- 
Inon   Sharony
×™× ×•×Ÿ     ×©×¨×•× ×™
+972(3)6407634
atto.TAU.ac.IL/~inonshar
Please consider your environmental responsibility before printing
this e-mail.