[gmx-users] nature of gromacs / gcc-4.x problem

chris.neale at utoronto.ca chris.neale at utoronto.ca
Thu Aug 7 17:23:13 CEST 2008

> That sounds good, but I'm not sure if it is enough.
Agreed. I'll recompile and start from previous checkpoints.

> Did you select "Closed bugs" as well?
ouch! You're right, thanks for the tip.

The error is mentioned here:
and http://www.bionmr.com/board/showthread.php?p=198

I still don't know exactly what the problem was, but since I have  
already decided to redo these runs I have lost my interest in that  
exact information.

As an aside: bug 108 did not show up on a search for gcc, although it  
clearly contains the word. The search returned bugs 141 and 102 --  
both relevant, but why it does not also return 108 is unclear

> It would indeed be great if we could do more exhaustive tests at compile
> time...
Agreed. In my case, I knew the issues and just installed without  
thinking enough. The tests are most important for new users I think.

Thanks Again,

More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users mailing list