[gmx-users] Re: gmx-users Digest, Vol 52, Issue 96
Justin A. Lemkul
jalemkul at vt.edu
Sat Aug 23 21:35:26 CEST 2008
Ragnarok sdf wrote:
> Tahnk you Justein for the reply.
> I read again chapter 5, this time I tried to be more thorough, but still
> I don't really understand why my topology is coming out bad. My .itp
> files do not look like the one from the manual abou UREA. What i mean
> is, the angles and bonds parts of the file have only 3 columns. Although
> I read the manual, I am still not sure about the real problem here.
There is no problem with only having three or four columns, per se. Amber
topologies will be shown as such. The bonded parameters will be read from the
ffamber*bon.itp file. Have you identified the atoms involved in the problematic
bond(s) and angle(s)?
> You mentioned that each residue should end up with an integer charge.
> Well, mine don't.
> What exactly do you mean with "post one of your nucleotides here"? From
> my pdb file or from my itp generated files? The entire double helix with
> all nucleotides or really just one of them?
Post a single nucleotide from the topology. Sorry if I wasn't clear. What
would be interesting to see is what charges and atom types you've been assigning
to each nucleotide.
> Sorry for asking these details. But I just want to make sure I don't
> waste your time with useless posts.
Much appreciated :)
> Thank you again
> And thank you in advance
> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
Justin A. Lemkul
Graduate Research Assistant
Department of Biochemistry
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users