[gmx-users] Force Field: A new chemical compound
Justin A. Lemkul
jalemkul at vt.edu
Thu Jul 3 21:00:24 CEST 2008
Chih-Ying Lin wrote:
> Honestly, I don't know how to do the quantum chemistry calculation.
> I have the one azobenzene derivative force field parameters(from QM/MM
> paper) in hand.
> This azobenzene derivative is quite similar with the azotab compound,
> which I need.
> For the rest parts of the azotab compound I try to used the default
> force field parameters, which come from either Amber or Gromacs
> Will it be reasonable to determine the force field parameters of the
> new compound like I mentioned above?
> Azotab will put into water; however, the force field parameters of the
> azobenzene derivative are coming from the QM/MM calculation in gas
> phase. So, will it be wrong afterall?
The general answer to this type of question is that you have to derive
the parameters for a compound in a way that is compatible with the force
field you choose to use. For an AMBER-type force field, quantum
calculations may be in order. For a FF like OPLS and GROMOS, empirical
derivation/adjustment and free energy calculations are the correct protocol.
Bottom line: read that paper regarding the derivation of the force field
you want, and follow that methodology.
> Thanks a lot
> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
Justin A. Lemkul
Graduate Research Assistant
Department of Biochemistry
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users