[gmx-users] Re Re Re: charge group in topology file

Justin A. Lemkul jalemkul at vt.edu
Wed Jul 16 19:03:11 CEST 2008



alkasrivastava at iitb.ac.in wrote:
> Thanks for the reply
> 
> but if you see the charge group which include N and H is not an integer
> 
>      10   opls_238      2    ASN      N      3       -0.5    14.0067   ;
> qtot 0.5
>     11   opls_241      2    ASN      H      3        0.3      1.008   ;
> qtot 0.8
> 
> 
> 
> 
>     24   opls_238      3    ASN      N      9       -0.5    14.0067   ;
> qtot 0.5
>     25   opls_241      3    ASN      H      9        0.3      1.008   ;
> qtot 0.8
> 
> 
> so wherever NH charge group is the there the total charge is always fraction.
> Is is correct to continue with this.

It is not *always* true that a charge group will contain an integer charge, 
especially (as I have noticed) in using all-atom force fields (OPLS, AMBER, 
CHARMM).  As long as each residue, and thus your molecule as a whole, has an 
integer charge, then things are fine.

-Justin

> 
> Thanks
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
> 

-- 
========================================

Justin A. Lemkul
Graduate Research Assistant
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin

========================================



More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users mailing list