[gmx-users] Re Re Re: charge group in topology file
Justin A. Lemkul
jalemkul at vt.edu
Wed Jul 16 19:03:11 CEST 2008
alkasrivastava at iitb.ac.in wrote:
> Thanks for the reply
>
> but if you see the charge group which include N and H is not an integer
>
> 10 opls_238 2 ASN N 3 -0.5 14.0067 ;
> qtot 0.5
> 11 opls_241 2 ASN H 3 0.3 1.008 ;
> qtot 0.8
>
>
>
>
> 24 opls_238 3 ASN N 9 -0.5 14.0067 ;
> qtot 0.5
> 25 opls_241 3 ASN H 9 0.3 1.008 ;
> qtot 0.8
>
>
> so wherever NH charge group is the there the total charge is always fraction.
> Is is correct to continue with this.
It is not *always* true that a charge group will contain an integer charge,
especially (as I have noticed) in using all-atom force fields (OPLS, AMBER,
CHARMM). As long as each residue, and thus your molecule as a whole, has an
integer charge, then things are fine.
-Justin
>
> Thanks
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
>
--
========================================
Justin A. Lemkul
Graduate Research Assistant
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
========================================
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list