[gmx-users] Re: Re: problem about g_sas of POPC bilayer
minnale
minnale_gnos at rediffmail.com
Fri Jun 6 08:44:32 CEST 2008
Thanks for your reply
NO, I am having 64 lipids in each leaflet of bilayer.
I want to calculate average area per lipid. what I have mentioned options are correct for g_sas?
Thanks for your appreciation
innale wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have downloaded POPC bilayer from peter teileman,s website and
> simulated for 5ns under anisotropic pressure coupling. When I drew a
> potential energy plot its shown that system is stabilised, so I have
> stopped the simulation at 5ns.
> After that I have mentioned g_sas command for calculating surface area
> of lipid in this way and got .xvg file like below mentioned
>
> command : g_sas -f 5ns_popc.xtc -s min_popc.tpr -pbc -o area_popc.xvg
>
> .xvg File:
> @ title "Solvent Accessible Surface"
> @ xaxis label "Time (ps)"
> @ yaxis label "Area (nm\S2\N)"
> @TYPE xy
> @ view 0.15, 0.15, 0.75, 0.85
> @ legend on
> @ legend box on
> @ legend loctype view
> @ legend 0.78, 0.8
> @ legend length 2
> @ s0 legend "Hydrophobic"
> @ s1 legend "Hydrophilic"
> @ s2 legend "Total"
> @ s3 legend "D Gsolv"
> 0 152.383 228.165 380.548 0
> 0.2 149.279 230.277 379.555 0
> 0.4 153.175 229.306 382.481 0
> 0.6 149.312 229.188 378.499 0
> 0.8 149.708 228.811 378.518 0
> 1 149.972 229.69 379.662 0
> 1.2 155.587 229.615 385.202 0
> 1.4 151.953 227.696 379.649 0
> 1.6 149.113 229.903 379.016 0
> 1.8 151.062 227.394 378.456 0
> 2 149.278 226.934 376.213 0
> 2.2 151.095 225.68 376.774 0
> 2.4 149.873 229.576 379.449 0
> 2.6 148.387 230.391 378.778 0
> 2.8 147.627 227.792 375.419 0
> 3 148.156 229.589 377.745 0
> 3.2 145.051 229.568 374.619 0
> 3.4 147.231 229.814 377.044 0
> 3.6 145.348 229.392 374.741 0
> 3.8 148.717 229.43 378.146 0
> 4 153.307 230.834 384.142 0
> 4.2 153.604 230.6 384.204 0
> 4.4 154.397 229.345 383.742 0
> 4.6 155.718 230.864 386.582 0
> 4.8 155.685 231.226 386.911 0
> 5 152.911 231.332 384.243 0
> 5.2 153.935 229.453 383.388 0
> 5.4 154.43 231.396 385.826 0
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> till 5000ps.
>
> I have searched in gmx-archives about SAS of lipid, I found that lipid
> SAS should be 0.64 nm^2/sec but I got values range from 150 to 170nm2/sec
>>Let me guess, .64 x 256 = 150 nm^2. Do you have 256 lipids?
>
> Could you please tell where I have done mistake?
> Thanks in advance.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://maillist.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-users/attachments/20080606/8fa42c78/attachment.html>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list