[gmx-users] Loss of bonds in HEME iron after pdb2gmx

Justin A. Lemkul jalemkul at vt.edu
Tue Nov 25 13:17:14 CET 2008



saradas at ncbs.res.in wrote:
> Hello,
> Sorry, I realised the HEME HEC naming was not the problem. But still the
> pdb2gmx causes loss of all bonds of FE in HEME. The cystine also gets
> protonated and doesnot form a bond with HEME. I tried to preserve the
> bonds by editing the specbond.dat file. I do not know if it can be used
> for intramolecular bonding. Kindly inform if the modifications I have made
> are valid. The runtime information during the execution of pdb2gmx
> indicated the linking of FE in HEME to the N atoms. However, I do not see
> the bonds when I open the output file in Pymol. Please indicate how this
> problem can be resolved.
> 

Well, using visualization software may not indicate anything.  Most programs 
decide on bonds based on distance, not any sort of intelligent mechanism.  The 
question is whether or not these bonds show up in your topol.top.

> This is the content of my specbond.dat file:
> 
> 5
> CYS     SG      1       HEME    FE      5       0.25    CYS     HEME

Well, this may be why your Cys is getting protonated - you're telling pdb2gmx 
that it should be!  See the format of specbond.dat here:

http://wiki.gromacs.org/index.php/specbond.dat

The second-to-last column should be the new residue name for cysteine, probably 
you want something like CYS2.

> HEME    FE      5       HEME    NA      3       0.22    HEME    HEME
> HEME    FE      5       HEME    NB      3       0.22    HEME    HEME
> HEME    FE      5       HEME    NC      3       0.22    HEME    HEME
> HEME    FE      5       HEME    ND      3       0.22    HEME    HEME
> 

Why is this section (above) even necessary?  Are these bonds not defined in the 
.rtp file of your force field?  Which force field are you using?  I know these 
are defined in the Gromos-type force fields.

Try again with the original specbond.dat, but don't assume that visualization 
software will always indicate the presence/absence of a bond.  Examine your 
topology for that.

-Justin

> And these I obtained during the execution of pdbgmx:
> 
> Opening library file specbond.dat
> 5 out of 5 lines of specbond.dat converted succesfully
> Special Atom Distance matrix:
>                   CYS122  CYS135  CYS143  CYS146  CYS150  CYS237  CYS309
>                    SG958  SG1059  SG1118  SG1136  SG1165  SG1902  SG2475
>   CYS135  SG1059   1.677
>   CYS143  SG1118   1.076   1.092
>   CYS146  SG1136   1.313   1.792   0.749
>   CYS150  SG1165   1.175   2.054   0.978   0.426
>   CYS237  SG1902   2.194   3.510   2.536   1.933   1.632
>   CYS309  SG2475   1.745   2.703   2.469   2.507   2.423   2.449
>   CYS343  SG2748   4.679   4.998   4.364   3.763   3.870   3.329   4.426
>   CYS406  SG3265   2.258   2.657   2.051   1.603   1.744   1.886   2.198
>   CYS457  SG3657   2.232   0.829   1.894   2.582   2.825   4.173   2.898
>  HEME462  FE3693   2.257   2.566   1.949   1.489   1.669   1.956   2.343
>  HEME462  NA3694   2.456   2.680   2.110   1.663   1.862   2.118   2.486
>  HEME462  NB3695   2.199   2.426   1.883   1.498   1.704   2.088   2.247
>  HEME462  NC3696   2.061   2.462   1.795   1.321   1.479   1.809   2.217
>  HEME462  ND3697   2.331   2.711   2.031   1.505   1.657   1.841   2.455
>                   CYS343  CYS406  CYS457 HEME462 HEME462 HEME462 HEME462
>                   SG2748  SG3265  SG3657  FE3693  NA3694  NB3695  NC3696
>   CYS406  SG3265   2.501
>   CYS457  SG3657   5.547   3.210
>  HEME462  FE3693   2.512   0.219   3.147
>  HEME462  NA3694   2.361   0.325   3.240   0.211
>  HEME462  NB3695   2.647   0.293   2.977   0.208   0.295
>  HEME462  NC3696   2.671   0.286   3.064   0.209   0.420   0.297
>  HEME462  ND3697   2.389   0.314   3.318   0.208   0.297   0.416   0.293
> 
> 
> Linking HEME-462 FE-3693 and HEME-462 NA-3694...
> Linking HEME-462 FE-3693 and HEME-462 NB-3695...
> Linking HEME-462 FE-3693 and HEME-462 NC-3696...
> Linking HEME-462 FE-3693 and HEME-462 ND-3697...
> N-terminus: PRO-NH2+
> C-terminus: COO-
> Now there are 462 residues with 4749 atoms
> Making bonds...
> 
> Thanks.
> Sarada
> Graduate Student,
> NCBS, Bangalore
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hello,
> I am working with the simulation of cytochromeP450. In the output of the
> pdb2gmx command, the iron atom in the HEME loses all the bonds, including
> the sulphide bond with cystine. Also, the command changed the residue name
> from HEME to HEC. During the execution of the pdb2gmx, I get this warning:
> 
> Warning: 'HEC' not found in residue topology database, trying to use 'HEME'
> 
> Can someone please tell me, if this is responsible for the loss of bonds
> especially the one between CYS and FE. How can the bonds be retained?
> Thanks.
> Sarada
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
> 

-- 
========================================

Justin A. Lemkul
Graduate Research Assistant
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin

========================================



More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users mailing list