[gmx-users] Problem sasa 3.2.1 vs 3.3.2

[Anthony Cruz]

Thank you for your answer. Today I send the email directly to David and Erik. 
I hove they could help me. I will post the answer in the list. Thank you.

Cheers,

Anthony
On Thursday 18 September 2008 03:59:29 pm Tsjerk Wassenaar wrote:
> Hi Anthony,
>
> It's not even that different. The order is swapped (the colors) and
> the most notable difference is that the noise is higher in the newer
> version. The running averages will probably give very similar results.
> Still interesting to know what happened to the noise. The answer is
> probably in the source (and may be in a head belonging to a
> developer).
>
> Cheers,
>
> Tsjerk
>
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Anthony Cruz <acb15885 at uprm.edu> wrote:
> > Hi users:
> > Recently I run a simulation of a protein in DMSO with GROMACS 3.2.1. I
> > make the analysis with GROMACS 3.3.2 and GROMACS 3.2.1 .  When I do the
> > sasa analysis I observe differences in the sasa values between the two
> > versions. The total sasa seems to be same in the two graphs but the
> > hydrophobic and hydrophilic looks very different (see attached pictures).
> > What could be the problem? Which version will be the best for analysis?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Anthony
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
> > http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> > Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before
> > posting! Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> > www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> > Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php