[gmx-users] Performance problems with more than one node

[vivek sharma]

Sorry for the incomplete mail...i sent it by mistake

what i want to add is I am not able to run it with any of the option.....any
help and suggestion will be highly appreciated.
FYI size of my system is around 45000 atoms.

Thanks in advance,
Vivek

2008/9/25 vivek sharma <viveksharma.iitb at gmail.com>

> Hi friends,
> I am also facing the similar problem when tried to scale gromacs for more
> number of processors ,
> I have tried one job using gromacs on EKA, in an attempt to scale it for
> more number of processor I am able to get the reduction in simulation time
> upto 20 processors, it is taking more time for 40 processor for same
> simulation, and when tried with 60 processor, it crashed with segmentation
> fault.
> i HAVE TRIED OTHER OPTION LIKE CONSTRAINT_ALGO, COULOMBTYPE AND SHUFFLE
> OPTION
>
> 2008/9/25 Tiago Marques <a28427 at ua.pt>
>
> We currently have no funds available to migrate to infiniband but we will
>> in the future.
>>
>> I thought on doing interface bonding but I really think that isn't really
>> the problem here, there must be something I'm missing, since most
>> applications scale well to 32 cores on GbE. I can't scale any application to
>> more than 8 though.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>>                            Tiago Marques
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 6:30 PM, Diego Enry <diego.enry at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Tiago you can try merging two network interfaces with "channel
>>> bonding" it's native on all new (2.6.x) linux kernels. You only need
>>> two network adapters (most dual socket boards come with then), two
>>> network switches ( or two VPN on the same switch).
>>>
>>> To tell you the truth, you will not much improvement even with the
>>> latest gromacs version (4beta). However other software that may be
>>> used by your group like NAMD, GAMESS, will benefit a lot from this
>>> approach. (it almost doubles network bandwidth)
>>>
>>> The best solution for gromacs is to migrate to infiniband. Go for it,
>>> it is not super expensive anymore.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 1:48 PM, Jochen Hub <jhub at gwdg.de> wrote:
>>> > Tiago Marques wrote:
>>> >> I don't know how large the system is. I'm the cluster's system
>>> administrator
>>> >> and don't understand much of what's going on. The test was given to me
>>> by a
>>> >> person who works with it. I can ask him or look at it, if you can
>>> point me
>>> >> how to do it.
>>> >
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > you can count the nr of atoms in the structure:
>>> >
>>> > grep -c ATOM protein.pdb
>>> >
>>> > Jochen
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks, I will look at some of his posts.
>>> >>
>>> >> Best regards,
>>> >>
>>> >>                         Tiago Marques
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Jochen Hub <jhub at gwdg.de> wrote:
>>> >> Tiago Marques wrote:
>>> >>> Hi!
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I've been using Gromacs on dual-socket quad-core Xeons with 8GiB of
>>> RAM,
>>> >>> connected with Gigabit Ethernet and I always seem to have problems
>>> scaling
>>> >>> to more than a node.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> When I run a test on 16 cores, it does run but the result is often
>>> slower
>>> >>> than when running on only 8 cores on the same machine. The best
>>> result
>>> >> I've
>>> >>> managed is not being slower than 8 cores on 16.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> What am I missing here, or are the tests inappropriate to run over
>>> more
>>> >> than
>>> >>> one machine?
>>> >>
>>> >> How large is your system? Which gromacs version are you using?
>>> >>
>>> >> And have a look at the messages by Carsten Kutzner in this list, he
>>> >> wrote a lot on gromacs scaling.
>>> >>
>>> >> Jochen
>>> >>
>>> >>> Best regards,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Tiago Marques
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >>>
>>> >>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
>>> >>> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
>>> >>> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before
>>> posting!
>>> >>> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
>>> >>> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>>> >>> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> ************************************************
>>> >> Dr. Jochen Hub
>>> >> Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry
>>> >> Computational biomolecular dynamics group
>>> >> Am Fassberg 11
>>> >> D-37077 Goettingen, Germany
>>> >> Email: jhub[at]gwdg.de
>>> >> Tel.: +49 (0)551 201-2312
>>> >> ************************************************
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
>>> >> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
>>> >> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before
>>> posting!
>>> >> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
>>> >> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>>> >> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
>>> >> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
>>> >> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before
>>> posting!
>>> >> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
>>> >> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>>> >> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > ************************************************
>>> > Dr. Jochen Hub
>>> > Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry
>>> > Computational biomolecular dynamics group
>>> > Am Fassberg 11
>>> > D-37077 Goettingen, Germany
>>> > Email: jhub[at]gwdg.de
>>> > Tel.: +49 (0)551 201-2312
>>> > ************************************************
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
>>> > http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
>>> > Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before
>>> posting!
>>> > Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
>>> > www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>>> > Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Diego Enry B. Gomes
>>> Laboratório de Modelagem e Dinamica Molecular
>>> Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - Brasil.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
>>> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
>>> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before
>>> posting!
>>> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
>>> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>>> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
>> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
>> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before
>> posting!
>> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
>> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://maillist.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-users/attachments/20080925/0614cfae/attachment.html>