[gmx-users] which structure in NPT MD trjectory should be chosen to start another NVT MD?
Mark Abraham
Mark.Abraham at anu.edu.au
Mon Apr 27 10:34:31 CEST 2009
wuxiao wrote:
> Dear gmx users,
> Usually, we perform NPT MD to achieve optimized density of system and
> start another NVT MD to calculate other properties of interest. I think
> there are three possible ways to choose the structure to start another
> NVT MD:(1) the structure of last step in NPT MD trjectory;(2)the
> structure in NPT MD trjectory with the density closest to the averaging
> density;(3)the structure of last step in NPT MD trjectory but the box
> size needs to be rescaled so that it is the averaging size. My question
> is: which way should be chosen to start another NVT MD? I do not know
> whether this question is suitable here. Any hints would be thanked very
> much.
Bear in mind in your averaging that you're actually interested in the
average *after* equilibration, which often does not include the start of
a trajectory.
Otherwise, I think it's largely irrelevant except that you don't want a
density that's noticeably different from the one used in
parameterization of the forcefield. You'll still need a period of
further equilibration after any of the above choices.
Mark
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list