[gmx-users] Matching atom name and types in OPLS-aa FF

Tree tree.csc at gmail.com
Tue Mar 17 01:47:20 CET 2009


Dear Dr. Periole:


Thank you for your answer.

You meant that the types of potential functions do not have any relations
with OPLS-aa (except first ("1") case).
Those (from "2"...) are defined as written the Gromacs manual.


Thank you again.


Sincerely,

Kim

On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 5:42 PM, XAvier Periole <x.periole at rug.nl> wrote:

>
> On Mar 16, 2009, at 9:34 AM, tree wrote:
>
> Dear Justin and All:
>>
>>
>> I truly appreciate your clear answer.
>> Since my questions are solved by your explanations, I do not know how I
>> can express my grateful heart.
>>
>> Now I have to ask second step questions. :)
>> It is related to the OPLS-aa "bon.itp" file.
>> Each section (bonds, angle, diherdal, and etc.) has its "type".
>> I am wondering if this "type" (of course, in OPLS-aa case) has the same
>> meaning in the Gromos potentials.
>> As we know, those types for each kind of bonded interactions are well
>> described in the Gromacs manual with clear equations.
>> So, my question is (as I mentioned just above) if this is the same as the
>> OPLS-aa case.
>>
> Yes, the bond, angle, dihedral types are independent to the underlying
> force field
> and correspond to the description in the manual.
>
>
>> To make my question clear, I want to give an example.
>>
>> [ bonds ]
>> ...
>> CT      HC      1       0.10900 284512.0        ; CHARMM 22 paramter
>> ...
>>
>> I know the number "1" here means type, which describes what kind of the
>> bonds (strech) between two bonds is used.
>> If this is Gromos potential, I am sure this "1" means "harmonic" potential
>> according to the Chap. 4 of the Gromacs manual.
>> Is this also applied to OPLS-aa FF?
>>
>> Thank you for your care, again.
>>
>>
>> Sincerely yours,
>>
>> Kim
>>
>> On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Tree wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear All:
>>>> I appreciate your answer always.
>>>> Right now, I am trying to add/modify some values in OPLS-aa FF.
>>>> I am confused atom type (opls_xxx) and atom name (e.g., C) in "atp",
>>>> "bon.itp", and "nb.itp" files.
>>>> Please let me try the situation by an example, first.
>>>> In "atp" file,
>>>>  ...
>>>>  opls_058   12.01100  ; C  in COOR ester JPC3315(91)
>>>>  opls_059   15.99940  ; O= in COOR ester
>>>>  ...
>>>> In "bon.itp" file,
>>>>  ...
>>>>  C     CA      1    0.14900   334720.0   ; wlj 8/97
>>>>  C_2   CA      1    0.14900   334720.0   ; wlj 8/97
>>>>  ...
>>>> In "nb.itp" file,
>>>>  ...
>>>>  opls_009   C2  7      14.02700     0.000       A    3.90500e-01
>>>> 4.93712e-01 ; SIG
>>>>  opls_010   C3  6      15.03500     0.000       A    3.90500e-01
>>>> 7.32200e-01 ; SIG
>>>>  ...
>>>> I hope you can sense what my question is here.
>>>> When I define a residue in "rtp" file, I give some name for my atom in
>>>> my system and assignment between that specific atom name and opls_xxx.
>>>> Then, gromacs (pdb2gmx) is using "rtp" file to assign each atom to the
>>>> opls_xxx.
>>>> "nb.itp" also has opls_xxx information inside, so I can understand how
>>>> those values are assigned.
>>>> However, I am not clear how the procedue assign bonded potentials to the
>>>> system, because "bon.itp" file does not have any information related to the
>>>> opls_xxx.
>>>>
>>>
>>> It does, but only indirectly.  Example, from ffoplsaa.rtp:
>>>
>>> [ ACE ]
>>> [ atoms ]
>>>  CH3    opls_135   -0.180     1
>>> HH31    opls_140    0.060     1
>>>
>>> From ffoplsaanb.itp:
>>>
>>> opls_135   CT  6     12.01100    -0.180       A    3.50000e-01
>>> 2.76144e-01
>>> ...
>>> opls_140   HC  1      1.00800     0.060       A    2.50000e-01
>>> 1.25520e-01
>>>
>>> So the more literal interpretation of opls_135 is atom type CT, and
>>> opls_140 is HC.  I assume this is done for convenience.
>>>
>>> Therefore, in ffoplsaabon.itp:
>>>
>>> CT    HC      1    0.10900   284512.0   ; CHARMM 22 parameter file
>>>
>>> Also, my question related to the above sentece is whether the bonded
>>>> potentials are assigned according to the name of atom, which I defined in my
>>>> "pdb" file. (I doubt this... If this question is true, it can't be used for
>>>> general cases.)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Nothing is typically done based on atom names; atom types are much more
>>> important when considering bonded and non-bonded potentials.
>>>
>>> This is subsequently how I can add new values in the "bon.itp" file by
>>>> assigning the name in an appropriate way...
>>>> I think I am relatively clear in assigning between opls_xxx and name in
>>>> "nb.itp" file.
>>>> To summarize my question, how the assignment between opls_xxx and name
>>>> in the "bon.itp" can be defined-?
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Translate the opls_XXX atom types to a more "literal" type given in
>>> ffoplsaanb.itp.
>>>
>>> -Justin
>>>
>>> I hope my question and Englsh are clear enough...
>>>> Thank you again!
>>>> Sincerely,
>>>> Kim
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
>>>> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
>>>> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before
>>>> posting!
>>>> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
>>>> interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>>>> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> ========================================
>>>
>>> Justin A. Lemkul
>>> Graduate Research Assistant
>>> ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
>>> Department of Biochemistry
>>> Virginia Tech
>>> Blacksburg, VA
>>> jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
>>> http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
>>>
>>> ========================================
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
>>> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
>>> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before
>>> posting!
>>> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
>>> interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>>> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
>> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
>> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before
>> posting!
>> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
>> interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://maillist.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-users/attachments/20090317/cce9b6cc/attachment.html>


More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users mailing list