[gmx-users] How to edit the cgnr and charge fields of a ITP file with the result of Gaussian?
Liao Chuan
liaochuan at tju.edu.cn
Thu Sep 10 16:55:12 CEST 2009
Dear Gromacs users,
I obtained the ITP file of glycerol molecule from the Dundee PRODRG server
(http://davapc1.bioch.dundee.ac.uk/programs/prodrg/). However, I heard that
the charges are not accurate enough. So I estimated the charges of glycerol
using Gaussian. The input file of Gaussian is gol.gjf, including all atoms
of a glycerol molecule. The output of Gaussian is selected as follows:
-------------------------- Gaussian Output
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
Mulliken atomic charges:
1
1 O -0.677102
2 H 0.422534
3 C -0.156687
4 H 0.224462
5 H 0.169912
6 C 0.007200
7 H 0.182644
8 O -0.586768
9 H 0.435753
10 C -0.171961
11 H 0.173527
12 H 0.190745
13 O -0.630544
14 H 0.416285
Sum of Mulliken charges= 0.00000
-------------------------------------------END of Gaussian Output
----------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------ ITP file
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
[ atoms ]
; nr type resnr resid atom cgnr charge mass
1 OA 1 GOL OAB 1 -0.095 15.9994
2 HO 1 GOL HAA 1 0.043 1.0080
3 CH2 1 GOL CAA 1 0.052 14.0270
4 CH1 1 GOL CAC 2 0.078 13.0190
5 OA 1 GOL OAD 2 -0.114 15.9994
6 HO 1 GOL HAB 2 0.036 1.0080
7 CH2 1 GOL CAE 3 0.053 14.0270
8 OA 1 GOL OAF 3 -0.095 15.9994
9 HO 1 GOL HAC 3 0.042 1.0080
-------------------------------------END of ITP file
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Then it comes to edit the ITP file. But there are some problems puzzling me.
Firstly, the ITP file just has 9 atoms ( see above) as the Dundee PRODRG
server uses united-atom force field which neglects 5 unpolar hydrogen atoms
while the result of Gaussian has 14 atoms. How should I edit the charges of
ITP file? Or how could I edit the cgnr and charge fields of the ITP file
with the Gaussian result? Is it reasonable and acceptable that a charge
group has a decimal number of charges?
Secondly, the charge group number of ITP file is 3 whereas the result of
Gaussian has only one charge group(14 atoms as a whole group). Could the
Gaussian package calculate the charges of a molecules by first dividing the
atoms of the molecule into different charge groups?
Any help/suggestions will be greatly appreciated!
Thank you!!
Chuan Liao
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://maillist.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-users/attachments/20090910/624063e0/attachment.html>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list