[gmx-users] BUG in GROMACS 4.0.5, related to very log total integration time
Daniel Adriano Silva M
dadriano at gmail.com
Fri Sep 25 00:42:39 CEST 2009
Mark,
Your are right. Thanks
Daniel
2009/9/24 Mark Abraham <Mark.Abraham at anu.edu.au>:
> Daniel Adriano Silva M wrote:
>>
>> Dear GROMACS users and developers.
>>
>> I don known if this issued had been previously addressed, but I found
>> that when I try to run a MD with time-step of 2fs and 2500000000 steps
>> (yes 500us!!!) the dynamics aborts with the next message (64bit-LINUX
>> and icc 10 compiler):
>>
>> ####################
>> WARNING: This run will generate roughly 20576946697451257856 Mb of data
>>
>> starting mdrun 'F1-ATPASE'
>> -1794967296 steps, -3589934.8 ps.
>>
>> nodetime = 0! Infinite Giga flopses!
>> Parallel run - timing based on wallclock.
>>
>> #####################
>>
>> If i reduce the steps number by one order of magnitude then all goes
>> ok. My MDP when I obtined this error was:
>>
>>
>> ; VARIOUS PREPROCESSING OPTIONS
>> title = NPT simulacion
>> cpp = /lib/cpp
>>
>> ; RUN CONTROL PARAMETERS
>> integrator = md
>> dt = 0.002
>> nsteps = 2500000000
>> nstxout = 5000
>> nstvout = 5000
>> nstlog = 2500
>> nstenergy = 2500
>> nstxtcout = 2500
>> energygrps = Protein Non-Protein
>> nstlist = 10
>> rlist = 1.0
>> ns_type = grid
>> pbc = xyz
>> coulombtype = pme
>> rcoulomb = 1.0
>> vdw-type = Cut-off
>> rvdw = 1.0
>> fourierspacing = 0.12
>> pme_order = 4
>> optimize_fft = yes
>> ewald_rtol = 1e-5
>> tcoupl = Berendsen
>> tc-grps = Protein Non-Protein
>> tau_t = 0.1 0.1
>> ref_t = 300 300
>> Pcoupl = Parrinello-Rahman
>> Pcoupltype = Isotropic
>> tau_p = 1.0
>> ref_p = 1.0
>> compressibility = 4.5e-5
>> gen_vel = no
>> constraints = all-bonds
>> constraint-algorithm = Lincs
>> unconstrained-start = yes
>> lincs-order = 4
>> lincs-iter = 1
>> lincs-warnangle = 30
>>
>> I known this kind of error is not a priority since the total
>> integration time is ridiculous big, but anyway I want to comment it to
>> you.
>
> Yes, it's known. IIRC there was some discussion on the developers list about
> changing the relevant data type so that it can store bigger numbers. It's
> also a non-problem inasmuch as if you are ever able to run a simulation that
> long, manually resetting the number of steps to zero at a suitable point
> will be workable.
>
> Mark
> _______________________________________________
> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface
> or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list