[gmx-users] Is there sth. wrong with my pull code?
Justin A. Lemkul
jalemkul at vt.edu
Thu Apr 1 04:14:13 CEST 2010
程迪 wrote:
> Hi, gmx-users
>
> I have a 128 dopc lipid bilayer as group 0 and a 270 atom sio2 sphere
> as group 1. Sio2 is put on the top of lipid bilayer
>
> I want them get close together. But the simulation always crash down
> with a signal 11 fault when I pull the group 1.
> There's nothing strange in md.log and output on screen except the pull
> code. I do not know what happend. I think
> this might be something related to the pull code.
>
> I've run energy minimization. I am using gromacs 4.0.7 and ubuntu 9.10
> desktop. Both single and double precision version
> are tested.
>
> Thanks, any comments is appreciable.
>
> Here is part of md.log
>
> pull = constraint
> pull_geometry = distance
> pull_dim (3):
> pull_dim[0]=0
> pull_dim[1]=0
> pull_dim[2]=1
> pull_r1 = 1
> pull_r0 = 1.5
> pull_constr_tol = 1e-06
> pull_nstxout = 500
> pull_nstfout = 500
> pull_ngrp = 1
> pull_group 0:
> atom (6912):
> atom[0,...,6911] = {0,...,6911}
> weight: not available
> pbcatom = 3455
> vec (3):
> vec[0]= 0.00000e+00
> vec[1]= 0.00000e+00
> vec[2]= 0.00000e+00
> init (3):
> init[0]= 0.00000e+00
> init[1]= 0.00000e+00
> init[2]= 0.00000e+00
> rate = 0
> k = 0
> kB = 0
> pull_group 1:
> atom (270):
> atom[0,...,269] = {21279,...,21548}
> weight: not available
> pbcatom = 21413
> vec (3):
> vec[0]= 0.00000e+00
> vec[1]= 0.00000e+00
> wall_ewald_zfac = 3
> pull = constraint
> pull_geometry = distance
> pull_dim (3):
> pull_dim[0]=0
> pull_dim[1]=0
> pull_dim[2]=1
> pull_r1 = 1
> pull_r0 = 1.5
> pull_constr_tol = 1e-06
> pull_nstxout = 500
> pull_nstfout = 500
> pull_ngrp = 1
> pull_group 0:
> atom (6912):
> atom[0,...,6911] = {0,...,6911}
> weight: not available
> pbcatom = 3455
> vec (3):
> vec[0]= 0.00000e+00
> vec[1]= 0.00000e+00
> vec[2]= 0.00000e+00
> init (3):
> init[0]= 0.00000e+00
> init[1]= 0.00000e+00
> init[2]= 0.00000e+00
> rate = 0
> k = 0
> kB = 0
> pull_group 1:
> atom (270):
> atom[0,...,269] = {21279,...,21548}
> weight: not available
> pbcatom = 21413
> vec (3):
> vec[0]= 0.00000e+00
> vec[1]= 0.00000e+00
> vec[2]= 0.00000e+00
> init (3):
> init[0]= 4.70133e+00; the distance showed on screen is just
> this value. However, I set pull_dim = NNY, why there is a init[0]
> component?
> init[1]= 0.00000e+00
> init[2]= 1.59859e+04; is it right?
Certainly not, unless you have distances on the order of 15000 nm in your system :)
> rate = 0.01; can rate be negative? I mean I want
> distance decreased.
A more robust approach is to use:
pull_geometry = direction
pull_vec1 = 0 0 -1
That way, you're pulling along the negative z-axis. Distances can't be negative:
http://lists.gromacs.org/pipermail/gmx-users/2009-November/046720.html
You also have to make sure that the total distance you're pulling is less than
one-half of the z box vector to avoid PBC distances being measured spuriously.
-Justin
> k = 0
> kB = 0
>
>
> Di Cheng
>
> University of Science and Technology of China
> Hefei, Anhui Province 230026
> P. R. China
> E-mail: chengdi at mail.ustc.edu.cn
> Tel.: +86-15321055911
--
========================================
Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
========================================
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list