[gmx-users] Trehalose RTP file trouble
Justin A. Lemkul
jalemkul at vt.edu
Tue Apr 13 00:24:38 CEST 2010
Michael McGovern wrote:
> Hi everyone. I'm doing some simulations involving the sugar trehalose,
> with the 53a6 force field. There is an odd issue I am having with the
> rtp file for trehalose. It seems to be charged. Here is the beginning
> of the rtp entry:
>
> [ TRH ]
> [ atoms ]
> HO4 H 0.41000 0
> O4 OA -0.64200 0
> C4 CH1 0.23200 0
> C3 CH1 0.23200 1
> O3 OA -0.64200 1
> HO3 H 0.41000 1
> C2 CH1 0.23200 2
> O2 OA -0.64200 2
> HO2 H 0.41000 2
> C6 CH1 0.23200 3
> O6 OA -0.64200 3
> HO6 H 0.41000 3
> C5 CH1 0.37800 4
> O5 OA -0.45000 4
> C1 CH1 0.24200 4
> O1 OA -0.34000 4
> C1' CH1 0.24200 4
> O5' OA -0.45000 4
> C5' CH1 0.37800 4
> C4' CH1 0.27500 5
> O4' OA -0.60000 5
> HO4' H 0.47000 5
> C3' CH1 0.23200 6
> O3' OA -0.64200 6
> HO3' H 0.41000 6
> C2' CH1 0.23200 7
> O2' OA -0.64200 7
> HO2' H 0.41000 7
> C6' CH1 0.23200 8
> O6' OA -0.64200 8
> HO6' H 0.41000 8
>
> Charge group 5 has a net charge of +0.145. Is this a typo? Should I
> just change it to be the same as the other C-O-H charge groups?
>
>
The net charge certainly seems wrong. Before making any ad hoc changes, though,
refer to the primary literature for the force field and make sure everything
else is right. I think 53a6 has the same charges as 45a4, wherein the sugar
parameters were improved from 45a3. I don't see any mention of modifications to
sugars in the 53a6 paper. 45a4 ref:
Lins and Hunenberger (2005) J Comput Chem 26: 1400-1412.
-Justin
--
========================================
Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
========================================
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list