[gmx-users] Constrained simulations crash when bilayer moves in the z direction in the box

Thu Apr 29 16:23:25 CEST 2010

The translation occurs in the z direction, yes. I'm running many constrained simulations but in general the movement of the new simulations, in which the COM translation has been removed for the bilayer and water separately, is about 1 nm in 3 ns. The movement is slower than when I was running the comm-grps = the whole system all together, but the system will still end up crossing the pbc sometime during the simulations.

Emma Eriksson
PhD student in biophysical chemistry
School of chemistry
National University of Ireland - Galway
Galway, Ireland
________________________________________
Från: gmx-users-bounces at gromacs.org [gmx-users-bounces at gromacs.org] f&#246;r XAvier Periole [x.periole at rug.nl]
Skickat: den 29 april 2010 14:28
Till: jalemkul at vt.edu; Discussion list for GROMACS users
Ämne: Re: [gmx-users] Constrained simulations crash when bilayer moves  in      the z direction in the box

It is indeed not clear how you system may translate still! Is this
translation on
the z axis? How much does it move and how quick?

On Apr 29, 2010, at 3:09 PM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote:

>
> Do you have sufficient water on either "side" of your membrane?
> That is, are the lipids crossing PBC because of spurious
> interactions with the other side of the membrane?  That would
> certainly be a reason for a crash - the model physics is breaking
> down.  How did you generate your initial membrane configuration?
>
> -Justin
>
> ERIKSSON, EMMA wrote:
>> Hi again,
>> I thought your suggestions would work for my membrane, but it seems
>> like the removal of COM translation of the bilayer and water
>> separately does not stop the system from translating in the box. My
>> new simulations are now soon crashing again since the lipids are
>> crossing the pbc. I was using two comm-grps, one containing
>> DPPC_CHOL_MOL and one with water. How is it possible that the
>> system still is able to translate? Is there any other way to do
>> this? Otherwise I have to manually translate the system back to its
>> original position in the box after the simulation has crashed and
>> then continue the simulation, but this is not very good since I
>> cannot use the checkpoint file then and the continuation is not
>> exact. Any suggestion what to do? Thanks in advance.
>> Emma
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *Från:* gmx-users-bounces at gromacs.org [gmx-users-
>> bounces at gromacs.org] för XAvier Periole [x.periole at rug.nl]
>> *Skickat:* den 27 april 2010 16:32
>> *Till:* Discussion list for GROMACS users
>> *Ämne:* Re: [gmx-users] Constrained simulations crash when bilayer
>> moves in the z direction in the box
>> you should remove the water and lipid bilayer COM separately. I am
>> not sure what you should do with your small molecule though.
>> Probably best to add it to the bilayer as you constrain their
>> relative position!
>> On Apr 27, 2010, at 4:32 PM, ERIKSSON, EMMA wrote:
>>> Hi again,
>>> Thanks Xavier for your reply. I didn't know that this mdp option
>>> existed. However, I read the manual and also checked the mdout.mdp
>>> files for my previous simulations, and I understood it as if those
>>> are the default settings even if you don't specify any of them in
>>> the md.mdp file. The default comm_groups is the whole system so I
>>> guess if I'm not writing anything there it will take the whole
>>> system. In that case I think that in my previous simulations the
>>> translational motion should have been removed for the whole
>>> system, but since it's obviously not remove something is wrong. Or
>>> did I misunderstand everything? My system consists of DPPC lipids,
>>> cholesterol, water and one small molecule. Should I specify
>>> comm_groups as only the lipids? In that case I get a warning from
>>> grompp. You wrote comm-grps = membrane solvent + ions. Only the
>>> water then?
>>> Sorry that I didn't understand you explanation.
>>> Emma
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> *Från:* gmx-users-bounces at gromacs.org <mailto:gmx-users-bounces at gromacs.org
>>> > [gmx-users-bounces at gromacs.org <mailto:gmx-users-bounces at gromacs.org
>>> >] för XAvier Periole [x.periole at rug.nl <mailto:x.periole at rug.nl>]
>>> *Skickat:* den 27 april 2010 12:41
>>> *Till:* Discussion list for GROMACS users
>>> *Ämne:* Re: [gmx-users] Constrained simulations crash when bilayer
>>> moves in the z direction in the box
>>>
>>>
>>> The crash seems to be expected as by crossing the pbc the distance
>>> will change significantly
>>> and in way the algorithm can not handle.
>>> Note that the overall translational motion of your system should
>>> always be removed.
>>> The removal of the COM motion of your bilayer should be sufficient
>>> to prevent the overall
>>> motion of the bilayer. have a look at the following option in the
>>> mdp:
>>> ; mode for center of mass motion removal
>>> comm-mode                = Linear
>>> ; number of steps for center of mass motion removal
>>> nstcomm                  = 1
>>> ; group(s) for center of mass motion removal
>>> comm-grps                = membrane solvent+ions
>>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 27, 2010, at 12:07 PM, ERIKSSON, EMMA wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all!
>>>> I have a problem regarding lipid bilayer simulations in Gromacs
>>>> 4. During some of my simulations the whole system is moving in
>>>> the z direction in the box, meaning that after some time the
>>>> lipids are going out in the bottom of the box and coming in in
>>>> the top of the box, since I'm using periodic boundary conditions.
>>>> This doesn't matter (I think) when running non-constrained
>>>> simulations, however when I'm constraining the distance between
>>>> the lipids (pull_geometry=cylinder) and a molecule in the system
>>>> the system explodes and the simulations crash when the lipids are
>>>> starting to cross over to the other side. The fact that the
>>>> system is moving in the box must be the problem since the system
>>>> explodes exactly when the first lipid passes over to the other
>>>> side and nothing like this ever happens when the bilayer is not
>>>> moving in the box. Is there any way to freeze the cylindrical COM
>>>> of the lipids or something like that so that they stay more or
>>>> less in the middle of the box all the time? I don't want to use
>>>> freezegrps and freezedim = N N Y as this freezes the lipids
>>>> completely in the z direction, and that's not what I want, I want
>>>> them to be free to move as before but I want to stop the whole
>>>> system from moving too much in the z direction. Anyone that has
>>>> experienced a similar problem or know how to go about with this?
>>>> I would really appreciate any help I can get. Thanks.
>>>> Emma
>>>> --
>>>> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org <mailto:gmx-users at gromacs.org
>>>> >
>>>> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
>>>> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before
>>>> posting!
>>>> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
>>>> interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org <mailto:gmx-users-request at gromacs.org
>>>> >.
>>>> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
>>>
>>> --
>>> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org <mailto:gmx-users at gromacs.org
>>> >
>>> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
>>> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before
>>> posting!
>>> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
>>> interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org <mailto:gmx-users-request at gromacs.org
>>> >.
>>> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
>
> --
> ========================================
>
> Justin A. Lemkul
> Ph.D. Candidate
> ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
> MILES-IGERT Trainee
> Department of Biochemistry
> Virginia Tech
> Blacksburg, VA
> jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
> http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
>
> ========================================
> --
> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before
> posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
> interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

--
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php