[gmx-users] Re: Buckingham to Lennard-Jones (Matteus Lindgren)
x.periole at rug.nl
Tue Feb 2 14:51:03 CET 2010
On Feb 2, 2010, at 2:24 PM, Matteus Lindgren wrote:
> Ok thanks, sounds interesting but I think I need some more details
> about how
> to run with L-J and Buckingham at the same time even though I have
> read the
You want to use LJ for some pairs and Buckingham for others ? or the two
It is as simple as using different LJ for different pairs! You just
have to tell
what type of potential eacj pair is using! Or do I miss something.
> On a side note, it seems sigeps can only convert from L-J to
> Buckingham not
> the other way around. In addition, the fit of the two potentials
> does not
> seem to be very good except in the tail of the functions. Shouldn't
> minima be prioritized?
Instead of fitting you could use tabulated potentials which would not
potential form ...
> Matteus Lindgren
>> Matteus Lindgren, graduate student
>> Department of Chemistry, Umee University
>> SE-901 87 Umee, Sweden
>> Phone: +46 (0)90-7865368
> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users