[gmx-users] Heating error
Justin A. Lemkul
jalemkul at vt.edu
Sun Jan 31 13:47:49 CET 2010
mohammad reaza dayer wrote:
>
>
> Dear Justin
> Greetings:
>
> I want to melt up hemoglobin, using simulated annealing methods. I used
> the following mdp file parameters:
> ****************************************************
> constraints = all-bonds
> integrator = md
> dt = 0.002 ; ps !
> nsteps = 100000 ; total 100.0 ps.
> tinit = 0
> init_step = 0
> nstcomm = 1
> nstxout = 500 ; collect data every 0.5 ps
> nstvout = 1000
> nstfout = 100
> nstlog = 10
> nstenergy = 100
> nstlist = 100
> ns_type = grid
> pbc = xyz
> rlist = 1.0
> coulombtype = PME
> rcoulomb = 1.0
> vdwtype = cut-off
> rvdw = 1.4
> fourierspacing = 0.08
> fourier_nx = 0
> fourier_ny = 0
> fourier_nz = 0
> pme_order = 8
> ewald_rtol = 1e-5
> optimize_fft = yes
> nstcomm = 1
> comm-grps = Protein Non-Protein
> Tcoupl = no
> tau-t = 0 0
> tc-grps = Protein Non-Protein
> ref-t = 310 310
> solvent_optimization = sol
> energygrps = Protein Non-Protein
> Pcoupl = berendsen
> Pcoupltype = isotropic
> tau_p = 0.5
> compressibility = 4.5e-5
> ref_p = 1.0
> gen_vel = no
> gen_temp = 310
> gen_seed = 173529
> annealing = yes yes
> annealing = single single
> annealing_npoints = 100 100
> annealing_time = 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
> 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
> 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
> 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45
> 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57
> 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69
> 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81
> 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93
> 94 95 96 97 98 99 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
> 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
> 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
> 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42
> 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54
> 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66
> 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78
> 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90
> 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99
> annealing_temp = 310 311 312 313 314 315 316
> 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326
> 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336
> 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346
> 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356
> 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366
> 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376
> 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386
> 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396
> 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406
> 407 408 409 310 311 312 313 314 315 316
> 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326
> 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336
> 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346
> 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356
> 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366
> 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376
> 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386
> 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396
> 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406
> 407 408 409 310
> ****************************************************************
> the simulation started with no warning but unfortunately the protein
> temperature increased for up to
> 2-3 ps and after that decreased to low temperatures. I have studies most
> of e-mails in gmx-archives regarding such error and tried all of them
> but I could not solve the problem. I will appreciate if your kindly help me.
It is useful to actually provide the link for any pertinent post for reference.
I think you're making the problem too complicated. Simulated annealing
increases the temperature linearly (per the manual), so I really see no need to
specify each time point individually, although I don't know why it doesn't work.
Simplify the problem:
annealing = yes yes
annealing = single single
annealing_npoints = 2 2
annealing_time = 0 100 0 100
annealing_temp = 310 409 310 409
In theory, the above should give you steadily-rising temperature over 100 ps.
-Justin
> Best Regards
> dayer
>
>
--
========================================
Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
========================================
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list