[gmx-users] amber parameters in gromacs
Justin A. Lemkul
jalemkul at vt.edu
Thu Jul 1 13:52:36 CEST 2010
Rolf Erwin Isele-Holder wrote:
> Dear gromacs-users,
>
> I've been simulating a box of liquid glycerol. The parameter's I have used were taken from an article, whose authors achieved good agreement between their simulation and experiments. These authors used an amber force field and the software ORAC.
>
> I used exactly the same parameters as them for my topology and very similar settings in my mdp file. However I did not get the same results as them. Do you know why I get these different results? I am in doubt weather the top of my topology is correct, so I pasted it here:
>
> #define _FF_GROMOS96
> #define _FF_GROMOS53A6
>
> [ defaults ]
> ; nbfunc comb-rule gen-pairs fudgeLJ fudgeQQ
> 1 2 yes 0.5 0.8333
>
> [ atomtypes ]
> ;name at.num mass charge ptype sigma epsilon
> OA 8 0.000 0.000 A 0.3442 0.879228
> C 6 0.000 0.000 A 0.3816 0.45803592
> H 1 0.000 0.000 A 0 0
> HC 1 0.000 0.000 A 0.2774 0.06573276
>
>
> [ moleculetype ]
>
> Glycerol 3
>
> [ atoms ]
> ; nr type resnr resid atom cgnr charge
> 1 OA 1 GLCR OAA 1 -0.585 15.9994
> 2 H 1 GLCR HAA 1 0.396 1.008
> 3 C 1 GLCR CAD 1 0.182 12.011
> .....
>
> I think, that by specifying comb-rule = 2 giving sigma and epsilon is correct instead of c6 and c12. The 0.5 for fudgeLJ and the 0.8333 for fudgeQQ are supposed to lower the 1-4 interaction.
>
Have you tried actually using the Amber ports for Gromacs? You've got some
weird hybrid monster going on here, defining Gromos96 as your force field, then
trying to make it look like Amber. Lots of potential sources of error here.
I would strongly suggest having a look here:
http://ffamber.cnsm.csulb.edu/
-Justin
> Regards,
>
> Rolf
--
========================================
Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
========================================
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list