[gmx-users] Fwd: dissolution of gases in liquid

Vitaly Chaban vvchaban at gmail.com
Mon Jul 12 22:21:35 CEST 2010

In addition, we also tried to equilibrate the liquid-gas interface in
the NVT and then switched on barostat. The result with barostat was
unfortunately the same. I suspect the problem is in the (anisotropic)
pressure coupling but I still have no idea how it can be corrected.
The described setup is taken for the literature where it is reported
to be successful.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Vitaly Chaban <vvchaban at gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:59 PM
Subject: dissolution of gases in liquid
To: gmx-users at gromacs.org

Hi all,

We are trying to calculate the solubility of argon in water using the
partial densities function. The following traditional MD setup is
used. The water (=4000) is in the center of the box and is surrounded
by the argon atoms (=50) along Z direction. The electrostatics is
treated with PME, the LJ - with a shifted force method, the cut-offs
are 0.9nm. The Parrinello-Rahman barostat is applied in Z direction
only. Water and gas are coupled separately to 298K. The FFs are OK
both for water and argon separately.

In the NPT, a rather strange result is obtained  (please see a plot) -
The argon atoms and the water molecules are distributed uniformly in
the box and this results in the unphysically big solubility of argon.
We tried also NVT (please see the above plot,
http://yfrog.com/3mdissolj) and got a better situation. This one is
rather physical if one considers the pressure which occurs in such

The question is WHY NPT gives so weird results? I would like to get
the dependence of the solubility vs pressure, thus I am interested in
NPT mostly.

Does anybody have any insights?

Dr. Vitaly Chaban

More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users mailing list