[gmx-users] nonbond_params
Justin A. Lemkul
jalemkul at vt.edu
Mon Jul 26 16:31:23 CEST 2010
Amir Marcovitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> my system is composed of two molecules, each is composed of a 36 carbon
> like dummy atoms i defined in the amber files (i.e., has the LJ
> parameters of a carbon)
> I'm interested in eliminating the attractive Lennard-Jones interactions
> between the dummy atoms , such that only the repulsive terms will account.
>
> I thought of adding a section to the *.top file: [ nonbond params ]
> and to set c6 to 0 such that the attractive term of the LJ is eliminated.
> I used exactly the same syntax of the tutorial (page 98):
>
> * D D 1 0.00000E-00 0.34252E-05* ; (D
> is just the name of my dummy atom)
>
> but got a syntax error when running grompp:
> *Fatal error:
> Syntax error - File Surface_Surface_1.5_Sep_2.5.top, line 642
> Last line read:
> '[ nonbond_params ]'
> Invalid order for directive nonbond_params*
>
> 1) what is wrong with my syntax? are there any further examples anywhere
> for the usage of [ nonbond params ] in topology files?
If you have already #included a force field file in the .top, it will have a
[nonbond_params] section in it already. You cannot add a new one. The proper
approach would be to modify the #included *nb.itp file.
> 2) Is [ nonbond params ] the right strategy to the task i described?
>
Sounds like one way to do it.
-Justin
> Many Thanks,
> Amir
>
>
>
>
--
========================================
Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
========================================
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list