[gmx-users] Questions about g_sham
Warren Gallin
wgallin at ualberta.ca
Wed Jun 23 20:11:13 CEST 2010
Justin,
Yes, in order to use the implemented free energy method, the end-to-end distance has to be treated like a constraint, creating a closed ring of constraints, which on some rare occasions leads to an instability and the system blows up.
I think that my best move is to write a little script that creates a free energy landscape for 1 dimension only. Now that I've got g_sham figured out, this simple case should be straightforward (he said, invoking the wrath of the gods).
Thanks for your insight.
Warren
On 2010-06-23, at 12:03 PM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
> Warren Gallin wrote:
>> OK, what if I have only one dimension (end-to-end distance), is there any way to do that in GROMACS, or is the best way to just write a little app for myself?
>
> Sounds to me like a problem for PMF, but I seem to recall you had some issues with that. g_sham requires 2 dimensions, so you can't use it for your purposes.
>
> -Justin
>
>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list