[gmx-users] pressure of the liquid in NPT and NVT
Vitaly Chaban
vvchaban at gmail.com
Tue Nov 2 20:09:08 CET 2010
Hi all,
Please suggest me what is the reason for the below situation.
The 1728 TIP4P waters system was simulated in NPT under 1bar
maintained with Parrinello-Rahman barostat at 300K. Some results are
below:
Energy Average RMSD Fluct. Drift Tot-Drift
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Energy -58121.6 344.637 344.476 0.182549 36.5101
Temperature 299.913 4.11684 4.1138 0.00274337 0.548679
Pressure (bar) 1.39811 326.506 317.633 -1.30948 -261.9
Box-X 3.74431 0.00844567 0.00843154 -8.45584e-06
-0.00169118
Density (SI) 984.768 6.66431 6.65307 0.0067005 1.34011
==========================================================
The density is stable and the system looks like equilibrated one.
The output GRO was then renamed to conf.gro and the average Box-X from
the previous run was set as the cubic box side length. The barostat
was switched off with no other changes in MDP. The same properties for
NVT are below:
Energy Average RMSD Fluct. Drift Tot-Drift
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Energy -58075.8 309.575 308.343 -0.477939 -95.5887
Temperature 299.916 4.08901 4.08678 -0.00233712 -0.467428
Pressure (bar) -18.5469 286.376 285.574 0.37081 74.1628
So the pressure in NPT is ~1.4 and in NVT is ~(-19). How to explain so
big difference in average values? Is it possible to get a value of
around 1 in the NVT?
Thank you.
Vitaly
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list