[gmx-users] C6 attractive term off OPLSAA
Mark Abraham
Mark.Abraham at anu.edu.au
Tue Nov 30 23:46:31 CET 2010
On 1/12/2010 5:06 AM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
>
>
> nishap.patel at utoronto.ca wrote:
>> I tried using the nonbonded parameters as defined below in my
>> ffoplsaanb.itp file for methanol in water and this is the syntax I used:
>>
>> [nonbond_params ]
>> ;i j func c6 c12
>> opls_154 opls_111 1 0.00E+000 2.43E-006
>> opls_154 opls_112 1 0.00E+000 0.00E+000
>> opls_154 opls_112 1 0.00E+000 0.00E+000
>> opls_155 opls_111 1 0.00E+000 0.00E+000
>> opls_155 opls_112 1 0.00E+000 0.00E+000
>> opls_155 opls_112 1 0.00E+000 0.00E+000
>> opls_156 opls_111 1 0.00E+000 2.70E-007
>> opls_156 opls_112 1 0.00E+000 0.00E+000
>> opls_156 opls_112 1 0.00E+000 0.00E+000
>> opls_157 opls_111 1 0.00E+000 3.01E-006
>> opls_157 opls_112 1 0.00E+000 0.00E+000
>>
>> When I tried to do mdrun, I got an error saying my system is
>> exploding. I tried doing the mdrun without nonbonded parameters and
>> it runs fine. So I am not sure if I am using the nonbond_params
>> concept correctly. i.e. I want C6 to be zero between my solute
>> (methanol) and solvent (water). This is the error:
>>
>> Warning: 1-4 interaction between 2 and 6 at distance 3.786 which is
>> larger than the 1-4 table size 2.500 nm
>> These are ignored for the rest of the simulation
>> This usually means your system is exploding,
>> if not, you should increase table-extension in your mdp file
>> or with user tables increase the table size
>>
>> Suggestions?
>>
>
> Your implementation of your concept is technically correct, but
> perhaps physically unreasonable. You're turning off the attractive LJ
> component and leaving only a repulsive component. It sounds about
> right that everything is flying apart.
Indeed. The way to do this is with mdrun -rerun on a trajectory
generated with the normal version of the forcefield, as I think I said
in another thread yesterday.
Mark
>
> -Justin
>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> -Nisha P
>>
>> Quoting nishap.patel at utoronto.ca:
>>
>>> Okay I am going to give it a try. I just wanted to make sure I was
>>> calculating C6 and C12 correctly as well using sigma and epsilon
>>> according to rule 3
>>>
>>> C12 = Sigma^(6)*C6
>>> C6 = 4*sigma^(6)*epsilon
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>> Quoting "Justin A. Lemkul" <jalemkul at vt.edu>:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> nishap.patel at utoronto.ca wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have a concern regarding C6 attractive term in LJ potential. I
>>>>> am using OPLS-AA force field, and I wish to turn off attractive
>>>>> term C6 by setting the parameters to zero. One of the suggestion
>>>>> was to add a [nonbond_params] in my ffoplsaanb.itp file and set
>>>>> the C6 to zero between the non-bonded pair. In my system for
>>>>> example, which consists of one methanol in water, I wish to set
>>>>> C6 term to zero between my solute and solvent. Since OPLSAA is
>>>>> all atom force field it treats each atom individually and has
>>>>> sigma and epsilon for each atom, so I am not sure how I would
>>>>> actually set my nonbond_params in my nb.itp file. I realize I
>>>>> need to convert each sigma and epsilon to C6 and C12, so say for
>>>>> example for methanol in water my [nonbond_params] would look
>>>>> something like this?
>>>>>
>>>>> [ nonbond_params ]
>>>>> ; i j func c6 c12
>>>>> CT OW 1 0.00 calculated value for C12 here?
>>>>> CT HW1 1 0.00
>>>>> CT HW2 1 0.00
>>>>>
>>>>> CT is the carbon in Methanol. OW, HW1 an HW2 correspond to atoms
>>>>> in TIP3P water model
>>>>>
>>>>> Is that correct? Would I have to do that for each atom in methanol?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sounds about right to me.
>>>>
>>>> -Justin
>>>>
>>>>> Any suggestions would be appreciated.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nisha P
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> ========================================
>>>>
>>>> Justin A. Lemkul
>>>> Ph.D. Candidate
>>>> ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
>>>> MILES-IGERT Trainee
>>>> Department of Biochemistry
>>>> Virginia Tech
>>>> Blacksburg, VA
>>>> jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
>>>> http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
>>>>
>>>> ========================================
>>>> --
>>>> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
>>>> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
>>>> Please search the archive at
>>>> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
>>>> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
>>>> interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>>>> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>>
>>
>>
>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list