[gmx-users] LINCS vs SHAKE
saipooja at gmail.com
Sun Oct 31 22:12:09 CET 2010
Yes, I understand that. But then this is a protein in water simulation with
CHarmm forcefield and I cannot find a reason as to why does this happen(esp
after variable number of steps)? I have checked the .pdb files generated for
the steps where Lincs fails and it seems that H atoms for atleast 1
sidechain are in incorrect positions(usually clashing). There doesn't seem
to be a good way of analyzing this error. If you have any suggestions I
would be eager to try them.
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Justin A. Lemkul <jalemkul at vt.edu> wrote:
> Sai Pooja wrote:
>> For Replica exchange, is there any advantage of in using SHAKE over
>> LINCS(other than the stepsize)?
>> I am running an REM simulation and the simulation stops after running for
>> variable number of steps (100000, 10000000 etc.) because some bond moves
>> more than 30 degrees and LINCS gives a warning.
> It has been said (check the archive) that LINCS is more stable. Just
> because you're getting LINCS warnings does not mean the constraint algorithm
> is to blame, it's just the first algorithm that fails when your model
> physics implodes.
>> Quaerendo Invenietis-Seek and you shall discover.
> Justin A. Lemkul
> Ph.D. Candidate
> ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
> MILES-IGERT Trainee
> Department of Biochemistry
> Virginia Tech
> Blacksburg, VA
> jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
> Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface
> or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
Quaerendo Invenietis-Seek and you shall discover.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users