[gmx-users] About implicit water simulations

[Per Larsson]

Hi!

This is not something that is planned for the immediate future, as useful as it might be. 

However, for small to medium sized systems one can get good performance by using the all-vs-all kernels. Then the problem of poor energy conservation disappears. 

Cheers
/Per

Skickat från min iPhone

9 sep 2010 kl. 15:54 skrev Christian Mücksch <muecksch at rhrk.uni-kl.de>:

> Dear users,
> 
> I got a question concerning simulations with implicit solvent. So far it is only possible to use this model when applying a cut-off for the long range electrostatic and vdW interactions which leads to bad energy conservation etc.
> 
> Will there be an update allowing to use reaction-field for instance or user-defined potentials with implicit solvent models?
> 
> Best regards,
> Christian Mücksch
> 
> -- 
> Christian Mücksch              Phone: +49 (0)631 205 4287
> Department of Physics          Fax:   +49 (0)631 205 4965
> TU Kaiserslautern              Email: muecksch at rhrk.uni-kl.de
> Erwin Schrödinger Straße
> 67663 Kaiserslautern
> Germany
> 
> -- 
> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists