[gmx-users] Re: energy group exclusions

Sikandar Mashayak symashayak at gmail.com
Tue Apr 19 18:12:14 CEST 2011


Yes, 7.3.19 says that all non-nonbonded interactions are excluded within
energy_exclusion groups.

What I really trying is to get forces on water atoms only because of water
water interactions and I want force on protein atoms to be zero, so I do md
rerun with energy_exclusion as PROTEIN PROTEIN PROTEIN SOL and also remove
any bond interaction information from .top file for protein, but still I get
force values on protein atoms. Not sure whats going wrong?

thanks
sikandar

On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 12:04 AM, Mark Abraham <Mark.Abraham at anu.edu.au>wrote:

>  On 4/19/2011 2:57 PM, Sikandar Mashayak wrote:
>
> so that means if I define a index group GRP and energy exclusion GRP GRP
> then all the non-boned interactions between atoms belonging to GRP group are
> excluded?
>
>
> What does manual 7.3.19 say?
>
> Mark
>
>
>  On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Mark Abraham <Mark.Abraham at anu.edu.au>wrote:
>
>>  On 4/18/2011 1:43 PM, Sikandar Mashayak wrote:
>>
>> Also, what about non-bonded interactions within the protein? Does
>> exclusion group only exclude the non-bonded interactions between two
>> different molecules and non-bonded interactions within the single molecule
>> atoms are still computed?
>>
>>
>>  The sets of atoms for energy groups and such exclusions are defined by
>> the index groups, not molecules. See manual 7.3 and wherever it talks about
>> groups in an early chapter.
>>
>>
>>  On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Sikandar Mashayak <
>> symashayak at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>>  When we define energy group exclusions e.g. like in manual energygrp
>>> excl = Protein Protein SOL SOL
>>> and do md rerun, then only non-bonded interactions between Protein and
>>> SOL are computed. I am wondering what happens to bonded interactions within
>>> the protein, do they contribute to energies even though we have excluded
>>> protein-protein interactions?
>>>
>>
>>  Bonded interactions are unaffected, as you will see if you try it.
>>
>> Mark
>>
>>
>> --
>> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
>> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
>> Please search the archive at
>> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
>> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
>> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>>
>
>
>
> --
> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://maillist.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-users/attachments/20110419/cec44932/attachment.html>


More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users mailing list