[gmx-users] SPC density
Theodora García
theodoraaagarcia at gmail.com
Wed Dec 28 09:34:50 CET 2011
Thank you very much for your advice... I have tried including dispcorr =
enerpres in my mdp file and the density increased a bit in a timescale of 5
ns but it is still far from the value expected for pure water. These are
the new results:
Statistics over 2500001 steps [ 0.0000 thru 5000.0000 ps ], 3 data sets
All averages are exact over 2500001 steps
Energy Average RMSD Fluct. Drift
Tot-Drift
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Temperature 298 2.67563 2.67534 2.70867e-05
0.135433
Volume 126.133 0.529594 0.529323 1.17324e-05
0.0586622
Density (SI) 978.114 4.10621 4.10412 -9.08266e-05
-0.454133
Heat Capacity Cv: 12.4733 J/mol K (factor = 8.06157e-05)
Isothermal Compressibility: 5.40447e-05 /bar
Adiabatic bulk modulus: 18503.2 bar
I guess I should get 1000 g/cm^3
Any other suggestion?
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 6:23 PM, David van der Spoel
<spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se>wrote:
> On 2011-12-27 17:57, Theodora García wrote:
>
>> Dear all
>> I am starting some MD simulations aimed to calculate the volume of a
>> solute in water as a function of the concentration. First I ran a
>> simulation of a box with 4124 SPC water molecules (similar number of
>> molecules that will be later used with my solute) for which I got the
>> following results after ~7.5 ns:
>>
>
> dispcorr = enerpres
>
>
>> Statistics over 3762001 steps [ 0.0000 thru 7524.0005 ps ], 3 data sets
>> All averages are exact over 3762001 steps
>>
>> Energy Average RMSD Fluct. Drift
>> Tot-Drift
>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**
>> -------------------
>> Temperature 298 125.156 125.156 1.9202e-05
>> 0.144476
>> Volume 126.908 53.2917 53.2917 5.61522e-06
>> 0.0422489
>> Density (SI) 972.142 408.201 408.201 -4.30887e-05
>> -0.324199
>> Heat Capacity Cv: 16.9588 J/mol K (factor = 0.176389)
>> Isothermal Compressibility: 0.543909 /bar
>> Adiabatic bulk modulus: 1.83854 bar
>>
>> Why am I obtaining so low density? The density seems to be constant over
>> that timescale.
>>
>> This is my mdp file:
>>
>> constraints = all-bonds
>> integrator = md
>> dt = 0.002
>> nsteps = 2500000
>>
>> nstxout = 5000
>> nstvout = 50000
>> nstenergy = 1000
>> nstxtcout = 5000
>> energygrps = SOL
>> nstlist = 5
>>
>> ns_type = grid
>> rlist = 1.2
>> rcoulomb = 1.2
>> rvdw = 1.2
>> coulombtype = PME
>> fourierspacing = 0.15
>> pme_order = 4
>> ewald_rtol = 1e-5
>> optimize_fft = yes
>>
>> Tcoupl = nose-hoover
>> tau_t = 0.1
>> tc-grps = SOL
>> ref_t = 298
>>
>> Pcoupl = Parrinello-Rahman
>> tau_p = 0.5
>> compressibility = 4.5e-5
>> ref_p = 1.0
>> pcoupltype = isotropic
>>
>> gen_vel = yes
>> gen_temp = 298
>> gen_seed = -1
>>
>>
>> Thanks in advance for any help...
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> David van der Spoel, Ph.D., Professor of Biology
> Dept. of Cell & Molec. Biol., Uppsala University.
> Box 596, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden. Phone: +46184714205.
> spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se http://folding.bmc.uu.se
> --
> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://lists.gromacs.org/**mailman/listinfo/gmx-users<http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users>
> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/**
> Support/Mailing_Lists/Search<http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search>before posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
> interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/**Support/Mailing_Lists<http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://maillist.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-users/attachments/20111228/be872ccc/attachment.html>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list