[gmx-users] angle constrain, constrained PF6 anion
Justin A. Lemkul
jalemkul at vt.edu
Tue Feb 1 19:00:59 CET 2011
gyorgy.hantal at fc.up.pt wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I am setting up a simulation of ionic liquids with the PF6 anion.
> According to the potential, the anion should be kept rigid, wich
> obviously means that bond lengths and angles have to be constrained.
> LINCS doesn't work with angle constraints (i.e. constraing a triangle),
> so we decided to use SHAKE. However, SHAKE seems to work a bit
> strangely: I know SHAKE mustn't be used with domain decomposition, but
> even if I set the corresponding variable to NO in the mdp file, the
> simulation crashes on 8 procs and gives the following error message:
>
> Fatal error:
> 1 particles communicated to PME node 7 are more than a cell length out
> of the domain decomposition cell of their charge group.
>
> If I try to run mdrun with -pd (to 'really' switch off domain
> decomposition), the simulation doesn't chrash but gives nonsense (the
> energy seems to increase constantly).
>
> I am not an expert user so maybe I do something wrong but, anyway, does
> anyone have an idea how to constrain this anion with Gromacs? I checked
> mailing list archive but couldn't find any answer corresponding to my
> question.
>
Without seeing a complete .mdp file, it's not possible to fully diagnose this
problem. The combination of SHAKE + particle decomposition should be stable,
but there are a whole host of different things that can go wrong.
-Justin
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Gyorgy
>
>
--
========================================
Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
========================================
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list