[gmx-users] is lincs used with virtual hydrogens?
Mark Abraham
Mark.Abraham at anu.edu.au
Sun Jun 19 02:20:04 CEST 2011
On 19/06/2011 6:56 AM, Roland Schulz wrote:
> My understanding is that the v-site algorithm is used for the virtual
> sites and LINCS is used for bonds not involving v-sites (and also
> angles if you choose contraint=angles).
Yep.
Also, with the LINCS warning about over-rotation, I get that regularly
with initial equilibration under conditions such as yours. It seems that
somehow -XH3 groups do this (so far I've only seen it in terminal NH3
and CH3). You can fix it by using a smaller time step for a period,
which gives the energy a better chance to equipartition properly.
Mark
> On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 4:40 PM, chris.neale at utoronto.ca
> <mailto:chris.neale at utoronto.ca> <chris.neale at utoronto.ca
> <mailto:chris.neale at utoronto.ca>> wrote:
>
> Thank you Roland.
>
> I did use:
>
> constraints = all-bonds
> lincs-iter = 1
> lincs-order = 6
> constraint_algorithm = lincs
>
> From looking at the manual, I figured that angle and bond constraints
> would all be done by LINCS if I had done (A):
>
> pdb2gmx -vsite none
> constraints = h-angles
> (a combination that I have never tried)
>
> But when I use (B):
>
> pdb2gmx -vsite hydrogen
> constraints = all-bonds
>
> It seems possible to me that LINCS is not used but instead the
> position of the atom is simply built from a mathematical function.
> Perhaps this all stems from my lack of thorough understanding of
> LINCS, but it seems to me that there need be no iteration to simply
> place an atoms based on virtual_sites3 (which are constructed by
> pdb2gms -hydrogen)
>
> For now, I'll simply add a line to state that I built virtual sites
> for hydrogen atoms to make it clear, but I'd still like to understand
> the difference between options A and B, above, if you have some time.
>
> Thank you again,
> Chris.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 4:13 PM, chris.neale at utoronto.ca
> <http://utoronto.ca> <
> chris.neale at utoronto.ca <http://utoronto.ca>> wrote:
>
> > Dear Users:
> >
> > If I create the topology of a peptide like this:
> >
> > pdb2gmx -f protein.gro -vsite hydrogens
> >
> > And then simulate it in vacuum, is lincs used at all? I believe that
> > it is, as if I use a timestep that is too large then I get LINCS
> > warnings about angles rotating more than 30 degrees, but that
> warning
> > message could possibly have been written with the assumption that I
> > used LINCS and not virtual hydrogens.
> >
> Probably. To make sure check the constraint-algorithm selected in
> your mdp.
> BTW: If you want to use large timecheck you should normally use
> constraints=all-bonds and lincs-order=6.
>
>
> >
> > Finally, is there a method that needs to be named or cited in
> relation
> > to the fact that the angles are now constrained? Is that also done
> > with P-LINCS?
> >
> This is also done with P-LINCS. Not sure whether one should sign
> something
> regarding the construction/usage of v-sites.
>
> Roland
>
>
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Chris.
>
>
> --
> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
> <mailto:gmx-users at gromacs.org>
> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org
> <mailto:gmx-users-request at gromacs.org>.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> ORNL/UT Center for Molecular Biophysics cmb.ornl.gov <http://cmb.ornl.gov>
> 865-241-1537, ORNL PO BOX 2008 MS6309
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://maillist.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-users/attachments/20110619/1b2ce1ba/attachment.html>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list